Prielipp R C, Coursin D B, Scuderi P E, Bowton D L, Ford S R, Cardenas V J, Vender J, Howard D, Casale E J, Murray M J
Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1995 Jul;81(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199507000-00002.
The selection and administration of neuromuscular blocking (NMB) drugs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain controversial. We compared the dose-response and recovery pharmacodynamics of a new intermediate-acting NMB drug, cisatracurium besylate, to the intermediate-acting NMB drug, vecuronium (VEC), in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study in critically ill adults. After informed consent, 58 mechanically ventilated ICU patients from five medical centers were randomized to receive either cisatracurium or VEC. Fifty-four of the 58 patients received NMB drugs before entering this study but demonstrated at least partial recovery (> or = one twitch) in the train-of-four (TOF) response before initiation of the NMB study drug. NMB drug infusion was titrated by peripheral nerve stimulation to maintain at least one twitch in the TOF response. NMB drugs were infused for 1-5 days. After discontinuation of NMB drug infusion, recovery of neuromuscular transmission was monitored with an accelerometer. NMB drug infusion for 28 cisatracurium patients averaged 2.6 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SEM) micrograms.kg-1.min-1 with a mean duration of 80 +/- 7 h. After discontinuing cisatracurium administration, recovery to 70% TOF ratio averaged 68 +/- 13 min. The mean infusion rate for 30 VEC patients was 0.9 +/- 0.1 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 with a mean duration of 66 +/- 12 h. Neuromuscular recovery after VEC averaged 387 +/- 163 min, which was significantly longer (P = 0.02) than that after cisatracurium. Prolonged recovery of neuromuscular function after discontinuation of NMB drug infusion (identified by the primary investigator at each medical center) was reported in two cisatracurium patients and 13 VEC patients (P = 0.002), and occurred despite the routine use of neuromuscular twitch monitoring. Seven VEC and one cisatracurium patients died during the infusion of study drug or within 48 h after discontinuation of the NMB drug infusion. In summary, we found recovery of neuromuscular function after discontinuation of NMB drug infusion in ICU patients is significantly faster with cisatracurium than with VEC. In addition, routine neuromuscular monitoring was not sufficient to eliminate prolonged recovery and myopathy in ICU patients.
在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)药物的选择和使用仍存在争议。在一项针对危重症成年患者的前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心研究中,我们比较了一种新型中效NMB药物苯磺顺阿曲库铵与中效NMB药物维库溴铵(VEC)的剂量反应和恢复药效学。在获得知情同意后,来自五个医疗中心的58例接受机械通气的ICU患者被随机分为接受顺阿曲库铵或VEC治疗。58例患者中有54例在进入本研究前接受过NMB药物治疗,但在开始使用NMB研究药物前,四个成串刺激(TOF)反应中至少有部分恢复(≥一次颤搐)。通过外周神经刺激滴定NMB药物输注,以维持TOF反应中至少一次颤搐。NMB药物输注1 - 5天。在停止NMB药物输注后,用加速度计监测神经肌肉传递的恢复情况。28例接受顺阿曲库铵治疗的患者NMB药物输注平均为2.6±0.2(均值±标准误)微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹,平均持续时间为80±7小时。停止顺阿曲库铵给药后,恢复至70% TOF比值平均为68±13分钟。30例接受VEC治疗的患者平均输注速率为0.9±0.1微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹,平均持续时间为66±12小时。VEC治疗后神经肌肉恢复平均为387±163分钟,明显长于顺阿曲库铵治疗后(P = 0.02)。在停止NMB药物输注后(由每个医疗中心的主要研究者确定),有2例接受顺阿曲库铵治疗的患者和13例接受VEC治疗的患者出现神经肌肉功能恢复延长(P = 0.002),尽管常规使用了神经肌肉颤搐监测。7例接受VEC治疗的患者和1例接受顺阿曲库铵治疗的患者在研究药物输注期间或停止NMB药物输注后48小时内死亡。总之,我们发现ICU患者停止NMB药物输注后,顺阿曲库铵治疗后的神经肌肉功能恢复明显快于VEC。此外,常规神经肌肉监测不足以消除ICU患者的恢复延长和肌病。