Bert F, Picard B, Branger C, Lambert-Zechovsky N
Hôpital Beaujon, Service de Microbiologie, Clichy, France.
J Med Microbiol. 1996 Oct;45(4):278-84. doi: 10.1099/00222615-45-4-278.
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was evaluated for its capacity to distinguish species and strains within species of groups A, C and G streptococci. The 99 strains tested, previously typed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), included 41 group A streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes), 25 group G Streptococcus spp. (GGS), seven S. dysgalactiae, 11 S. equisimilis, four S. canis, three S. equi and eight S. zooepidemicus. The combined data obtained with three single primers distinguished 82 types. RAPD analysis provided taxonomic results that were in general agreement with previous species classification based on DNA-DNA homology and MLEE. The intraspecies typing efficiency of the technique was significantly improved by the parallel use of several primers. RAPD analysis had greater discriminatory power than MLEE for GAS and GGS. There was not total agreement between the two techniques as RAPD distinguished strains with identical electrophoretic types, whereas MLEE differentiated strains with identical PCR types. RAPD analysis did not distinguish all GAS strains with different biotypes and its already high discriminatory power was further enhanced by concomitant biotyping.
对随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析区分A、C和G组链球菌种内菌株及种的能力进行了评估。所检测的99株菌株先前已通过多位点酶电泳(MLEE)分型,包括41株A组链球菌(化脓性链球菌)、25株G组链球菌(GGS)、7株无乳链球菌、11株似马链球菌、4株犬链球菌、3株马链球菌和8株兽疫链球菌。使用三种单引物获得的综合数据区分出82种类型。RAPD分析提供的分类学结果与先前基于DNA - DNA同源性和MLEE的物种分类总体一致。通过同时使用几种引物,该技术的种内分型效率得到显著提高。对于A组链球菌和G组链球菌,RAPD分析比MLEE具有更强的鉴别力。两种技术之间并非完全一致,因为RAPD能区分电泳类型相同的菌株,而MLEE能区分PCR类型相同的菌株。RAPD分析不能区分所有具有不同生物型的A组链球菌菌株,同时进行生物分型进一步增强了其已很高的鉴别力。