Miller T Q, Smith T W, Turner C W, Guijarro M L, Hallet A J
Department of Preventive Medicine & Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1153, USA.
Psychol Bull. 1996 Mar;119(2):322-48. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.322.
A new meta-analysis of research on hostility and physical health was conducted that includes 15 studies used in previous meta-analytic reviews and 30 new independent studies. Overall, the results suggest that hostility is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). For structured interview indicators of potential for hostility, the weighted mean r was .18. After controlling for other risk factors for CHD, the widely used Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and other cognitive-experiential measures were most predictive of all-cause mortality (weighted mean r = .16) and, to a lesser extent, CHD (weighted mean r = .08). Similar to other areas of research, the increased use of high-risk studies in recent years produced an increase in null findings.
一项关于敌意与身体健康的新的荟萃分析开展了,该分析纳入了之前荟萃分析综述中使用的15项研究以及30项新的独立研究。总体而言,结果表明敌意是冠心病(CHD)的一个独立危险因素。对于敌意可能性的结构化访谈指标,加权平均r为0.18。在控制了冠心病的其他危险因素后,广泛使用的库克-梅德利敌意量表和其他认知体验测量方法对全因死亡率的预测性最强(加权平均r = 0.16),对冠心病的预测性稍弱(加权平均r = 0.08)。与其他研究领域类似,近年来高风险研究使用的增加导致了阴性结果的增加。