Suppr超能文献

健康访谈调查。迈向方法和工具的国际协调统一。

Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments.

作者信息

de Bruin A, Picavet H S, Nossikov A

机构信息

Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.

出版信息

WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1996;58:i-xiii, 1-161.

PMID:8857196
Abstract

With the strategy for health for all and its 38 targets, the WHO Regional Office for Europe has created a common health policy for Europe, and has developed internationally agreed indicators for measuring progress towards the attainment of the targets. Some of these indicators are "classical" health indicators, such as mortality rates and the incidence of notifiable diseases, while others reflect more recent public health concerns such as health-related behaviour and quality of life. For the latter group, gathering the information necessary for monitoring and evaluating progress is somewhat haphazard. Health interview surveys provide the best -- in some cases the only -- means of collecting data on many of these indicators, since they mirror the information that only properly approached individuals may be able to provide and ensure that all subgroups of the population are covered. Yet such surveys have enjoyed a long tradition only in a few countries. Moreover, when these indicators are covered, the results are often not comparable. The methods and instruments used to collect data have often been developed without international coordination or adapted from those used in other countries, usually with substantial modification to suit what are perceived to be local requirements. There has also tended to be considerable uncertainty among those countries lacking a tradition of health interviewing as to the best way of conducting surveys. Against this background, the WHO Regional Office and Statistics Netherlands organized a series of consultations, which have resulted in the internationally agreed methods and instruments for health interview surveys set out in this book. These methods and instruments are likely in the longer term to become standards, thus improving comparability of information. This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys. It is thus essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies. It will also be useful to all in the public health community, including students and academics.

摘要

世界卫生组织欧洲区域办事处通过全民健康战略及其38项目标,制定了欧洲共同的卫生政策,并制定了国际商定的指标,以衡量在实现这些目标方面取得的进展。其中一些指标是“经典”卫生指标,如死亡率和法定报告疾病的发病率,而其他指标则反映了诸如与健康相关的行为和生活质量等近期公共卫生问题。对于后一类指标,收集监测和评估进展所需的信息多少有些随意。健康访谈调查提供了收集许多此类指标数据的最佳(在某些情况下是唯一)手段,因为它们反映了只有通过恰当方式接触个体才能提供的信息,并确保涵盖了人口的所有亚群体。然而,此类调查仅在少数国家有着悠久的传统。此外,当涵盖这些指标时,结果往往缺乏可比性。用于收集数据的方法和工具通常是在没有国际协调的情况下开发的,或者是从其他国家使用的方法和工具改编而来的,通常经过大量修改以适应被认为是当地的要求。在缺乏健康访谈传统的国家中,对于开展调查的最佳方式也往往存在相当大的不确定性。在此背景下,世界卫生组织欧洲区域办事处和荷兰统计局组织了一系列磋商,其成果是本书中列出的国际商定的健康访谈调查方法和工具。从长远来看,这些方法和工具可能会成为标准,从而提高信息的可比性。本书为健康访谈调查方法提供了实用指南。因此,对于所有参与此类调查规划和实施的人员,无论是国家统计机构还是公共或私人访谈机构,本书都是必读之物。它对于公共卫生领域的所有人,包括学生和学者,也将是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验