Milan M A, McKee J M
J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Fall;9(3):253-75. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-253.
Two experiments were conducted (1) to explore the application of token reinforcement procedures in a maximum security correctional institution for adult male felons and (2) to determine to what extent the reinforcement procedures disrupted the day-to-day lives of inmate participants. In Experiment 1, an expanded reversal design revealed that the combination of praise and token reinforcement was more effective than the combinations of praise and noncontingent token award or direct commands on four common institutional activities. The latter two combinations were not found to be any more effective than praise alone. Experiment 2, which also employed a reversal design, indicated that the high levels of performance observed during the token reinforcement phases of Experiment 1 could be attained without subjecting participants to undue hardship in the form of increased deprivation of either social intercourse or the opportunity to engage in recreational and entertainment activities. Client safeguards are discussed in detail.
(1)探索代币强化程序在一所关押成年男性重刑犯的最高安全级别的惩教机构中的应用;(2)确定强化程序在多大程度上扰乱了参与实验的囚犯的日常生活。在实验1中,一种扩展的反转设计表明,在四项常见的机构活动中,表扬与代币强化相结合比表扬与非偶然代币奖励或直接命令相结合更有效。后两种组合并不比单独表扬更有效。同样采用反转设计的实验2表明,在实验1的代币强化阶段观察到的高水平表现可以在不给参与者带来过度困难的情况下实现,这种困难表现为社交互动机会或参与娱乐活动机会的进一步剥夺。详细讨论了客户保障措施。