Suppr超能文献

模拟各种临床应用的枢轴轴承支撑式陀螺离心泵(C1E3)的溶血特性。

Hemolytic characteristics of a pivot bearing supported Gyro centrifugal pump (C1E3) simulating various clinical applications.

作者信息

Takami Y, Makinouchi K, Nakazawa T, Benkowski R, Glueck J, Ohara Y, Nosé Y

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 1996 Sep;20(9):1042-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1996.tb04592.x.

Abstract

Centrifugal blood pumps are playing a key role in circulatory mechanical assist systems including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), right and left ventricular assist devices (RVAD and LVAD), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Each of these circulatory assist systems requires specific flow and pressure conditions. In vitro hemolysis tests were performed using five compact mock loops with flow and pressure set equivalent to clinical conditions. These studies determined the hemolytic characteristics and clinical applicability of the pivot bearing-supported Gyro centrifugal pump with an eccentric port (C1E3) compared with the Bio-Medicus pump (BP-80). Normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) values of the C1E3 were less than those of the BP-80 under all conditions; in particular, they were significantly less in the CPB, LVAD, and RVAD conditions. In addition, linear correlation was observed between NIH values, rotational pump speed (RPM), total pressure head (delta P), and flow rate (Q) with both the C1E3 and BP-80: NIH = a(RPM/Q) + b, NIH = c(delta P/Q) + d. However, the slopes (a and c) of these equations were smaller with the C1E3 than those with the BP-80, which suggests that the C1E3 has decreased hemolytic characteristics when increasing the RPM and delta P. In other words, the increase of RPM and delta P results in less shear stress with the C1E3 than with the BP-80. One cause of these decreased hemolytic characteristics of the C1E3 is thought to be less pump power loss against an increase of RPM and delta P than with the BP-80. Furthermore, the average exposure time is shorter with the C1E3 than with the BP-80 because the priming volume of the C1E3 (30 ml) is smaller than that of the BP-80 (80 ml). From the point of both shear stress and exposure time, the C1E3 has less hemolytic features than the BP-80.

摘要

离心式血泵在包括体外循环(CPB)、左右心室辅助装置(RVAD和LVAD)、经皮心肺支持(PCPS)和体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)在内的循环机械辅助系统中发挥着关键作用。这些循环辅助系统中的每一个都需要特定的流量和压力条件。使用五个紧凑的模拟回路进行了体外溶血试验,其流量和压力设置与临床条件相当。这些研究确定了带有偏心端口的枢轴轴承支撑式Gyro离心泵(C1E3)与Bio-Medicus泵(BP-80)相比的溶血特性和临床适用性。在所有条件下,C1E3的归一化溶血指数(NIH)值均低于BP-80;特别是在CPB、LVAD和RVAD条件下,其值显著更低。此外,C1E3和BP-80的NIH值、泵转速(RPM)、总压头(ΔP)和流量(Q)之间均观察到线性相关性:NIH = a(RPM/Q)+ b,NIH = c(ΔP/Q)+ d。然而,C1E3的这些方程的斜率(a和c)比BP-80的小,这表明C1E3在增加RPM和ΔP时溶血特性降低。换句话说,与BP-80相比,增加RPM和ΔP时,C1E3产生的剪切应力更小。C1E3溶血特性降低的一个原因被认为是与BP-80相比,随着RPM和ΔP的增加,泵的功率损失更小。此外,由于C1E3的预充量(30 ml)小于BP-80的预充量(80 ml),C1E3的平均暴露时间比BP-80短。从剪切应力和暴露时间两方面来看,C1E3的溶血特性比BP-80更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验