Angi M R, Caucci S, Pilotto E, Racano E, Rupolo G, Sabbadin E
Institute of Ophthalmology, Padua University, Italy.
Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Jan;73(1):35-42. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199601000-00006.
The effects of auditory biofeedback training on myopia, visual acuity (VA), and psychological distress were evaluated in a controlled prospective study involving 55 mildly myopic (< or = -3.5 D) high school students. These myopes were divided into 2 groups, matched for age and dioptric defect: 33 were treated with visual training and 22 were not; 27 emmetropic subjects formed a further control group. Subjects were evaluated at the baseline (T0), at 10 weeks after the end of the treatment (T1), and after an interval of 12 months (T2) from the baseline for: (1) manifest and cycloplegic refraction, and the difference between them (cycloplegic tonus); (2) VA measured with a conventional optotype in all subjects, and also with a computer-generated optotype in the treated group; and (3) psychometric values and personality profile. At T2, myopia had significantly worsened both in the treated and in the control myopes; VA in the treated myopes appeared significantly improved when measured by the conventional optotype, but unchanged when measured by computer. Psychometric scores improved significantly in the treated myopes and in the emmetropic controls. Objectively the autorefractometer showed that 38% of the myopes had voluntary control of positive accommodation, i.e., the ability to increase spherical defect; no voluntary control of negative accommodation was observed. An increase in VA was associated with a significant increase in the foveation time (i.e., the period of time when the target is imaged on the fovea and the eye is motionless), and was partly attributable to a learning effect. In conclusion, biofeedback visual training had a positive effect on psychological distress and subjective VA improvement, but failed to reduce the existing myopia or delay its evolution.
在一项涉及55名轻度近视(≤ -3.5 D)高中生的对照前瞻性研究中,评估了听觉生物反馈训练对近视、视力(VA)和心理困扰的影响。这些近视患者被分为两组,根据年龄和屈光缺陷进行匹配:33名接受视觉训练,22名未接受训练;27名正视眼受试者组成另一对照组。在基线(T0)、治疗结束后10周(T1)以及自基线起间隔12个月(T2)时对受试者进行评估,评估内容包括:(1)显验光和睫状肌麻痹验光及其差值(睫状肌麻痹张力);(2)所有受试者使用传统视标测量视力,治疗组还使用计算机生成的视标测量视力;(3)心理测量值和个性特征。在T2时,治疗组和对照组的近视患者近视程度均显著加重;治疗组近视患者使用传统视标测量时视力显著提高,但使用计算机测量时视力无变化。治疗组近视患者和正视眼对照组的心理测量分数显著改善。自动验光仪客观显示,38%的近视患者能够自主控制正调节,即增加球镜度数的能力;未观察到对负调节的自主控制。视力提高与注视时间显著增加(即目标成像于中央凹且眼睛静止不动的时间段)相关,部分归因于学习效应。总之,生物反馈视觉训练对心理困扰和主观视力改善有积极作用,但未能降低现有的近视程度或延缓其进展。