Handley A J, Handley J A
Department of Medicine, Colchester General Hospital, UK.
Resuscitation. 1995 Dec;30(3):237-41. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(95)00892-6.
One of the arguments put forward in support of a relatively fast rate of chest compression during CPR, is that it facilitates the achievement of a high compression:relaxation ratio. This has been shown to increase blood flow. In this study a group of volunteers carried out chest compression at the rate that each felt was correct and comfortable. There was no significant relationship between compression rate and compression:relaxation ratio. In a second study volunteers carried out chest compression on a manikin at rates of 40/min; 60/min; 80/min and 100/min. There was no significant rate related difference in the compression:relaxation ratios recorded. The ability to achieve a high compression duration is not related to compression rate, and should not be a consideration when guidelines on CPR are revised.
支持在心肺复苏期间进行相对快速胸外按压的一个论据是,这有助于实现较高的按压与放松比例。研究表明,这可增加血流量。在本研究中,一组志愿者以各自认为正确且舒适的速率进行胸外按压。按压速率与按压与放松比例之间无显著关系。在第二项研究中,志愿者以40次/分钟、60次/分钟、80次/分钟和100次/分钟的速率在模拟人上进行胸外按压。记录的按压与放松比例中无显著的速率相关差异。实现高按压持续时间的能力与按压速率无关,在修订心肺复苏指南时不应作为考虑因素。