Suppr超能文献

句子验证任务中的图文差异

Picture-word differences in a sentence verification task.

作者信息

Goolkasian P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, UNCC 28223-0001, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1996 Sep;24(5):584-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03201085.

Abstract

Effects of picture-word format were investigated with four problem-solving items. In Experiment 1, picture-word input was presented for 8 sec followed by a test sentence that included verbatim and inference statements. Subjects made a true/false reaction time to the test sentence. In Experiment 2, the input remained on the screen while the test sentence was presented with varied stimulus onset asynchronies from 0 to 1,000 msec. Results showed that responses to pictures were faster than responses to words, and the format effect was larger with inference than with verbatim sentences. The picture advantage seemed to be due to the nature of the input and how information is extracted from it. The findings are discussed within the context of text-processing theories (Glenberg & Langston, 1992; Larkin & Simon, 1987).

摘要

通过四个解决问题的项目研究了图文格式的影响。在实验1中,图文输入呈现8秒,随后是一个测试句子,其中包括逐字陈述和推理陈述。受试者对测试句子做出真/假反应时间。在实验2中,当测试句子以从0到1000毫秒的不同刺激开始异步呈现时,输入保持在屏幕上。结果表明,对图片的反应比对单词的反应更快,并且推理句子的格式效应比逐字句子的格式效应更大。图片优势似乎归因于输入的性质以及从中提取信息的方式。在文本处理理论的背景下(Glenberg & Langston,1992;Larkin & Simon,1987)对这些发现进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验