Suppr超能文献

对乳糜泻患者小肠活检样本进行体外麦醇溶蛋白激发后抗肌内膜抗体的产生。

Production of antiendomysial antibodies after in-vitro gliadin challenge of small intestine biopsy samples from patients with coeliac disease.

作者信息

Picarelli A, Maiuri L, Frate A, Greco M, Auricchio S, Londei M

机构信息

Cattedra dl Gastroenterología, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet. 1996 Oct 19;348(9034):1065-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03060-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of many immune-mediated diseases is helped by detection of antibodies directed against the pathogenetic (self or foreign) antigen. In coeliac disease (CD), we have a situation in which antiendomysial antibodies (EMA), which are not specific for the pathogenetic antigen, reach a specificity and sensitivity of detection of CD approaching 100%, whereas detection of antibodies against gliadin (AGA), the pathogenetic antigen, is far less specific and sensitive in diagnosis. No direct evidence of a relation between gluten/gliadin challenge and EMA production exists. We tried to establish whether the small intestine of CD patients is the site of EMA production and whether gliadin challenge could induce their release.

METHODS

Small intestine biopsy samples from treated (23) and untreated (16) CD patients and controls (18) were cultured in vitro for 24-48 h in the presence of gliadin, another alimentary antigen, or medium. EMA and AGA were detected in the supernatants of these organ culture biopsy samples by ELISA and immunofluorescence technique, respectively.

FINDINGS

No EMA were found in the culture supernatants of biopsy samples of 18 controls, whereas they were detected in the culture supernatants of all 16 untreated CD patients irrespective of gliadin challenge. Conversely, EMA were not detected in supernatants of biopsy samples cultured in medium only from 23 treated CD patients, but were detected in 17 of the 23 biopsy samples challenged with gliadin.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that a more complex pathogenetic mechanism than normally accepted is involved in CD. Furthermore, our findings raise the possibility that EMA, or the antigen recognised by them, are involved directly in the pathogenesis of CD.

摘要

背景

许多免疫介导疾病的诊断借助于针对致病(自身或外来)抗原的抗体检测。在乳糜泻(CD)中,抗肌内膜抗体(EMA)虽并非针对致病抗原具有特异性,但对CD的检测特异性和敏感性接近100%,而针对致病抗原麦醇溶蛋白(AGA)的抗体检测在诊断中的特异性和敏感性则低得多。目前尚无麸质/麦醇溶蛋白激发与EMA产生之间关系的直接证据。我们试图确定CD患者的小肠是否为EMA产生的部位,以及麦醇溶蛋白激发是否能诱导其释放。

方法

将来自经治疗(23例)和未经治疗(16例)的CD患者及对照(18例)的小肠活检样本,在存在麦醇溶蛋白、另一种食物抗原或培养基的情况下体外培养24 - 48小时。分别通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和免疫荧光技术检测这些器官培养活检样本上清液中的EMA和AGA。

结果

18例对照的活检样本培养上清液中未发现EMA,而16例未经治疗的CD患者的培养上清液中均检测到EMA,无论是否有麦醇溶蛋白激发。相反,仅在培养基中培养的23例经治疗的CD患者活检样本上清液中未检测到EMA,但在23例经麦醇溶蛋白激发的活检样本中有17例检测到EMA。

解读

我们的结果表明,CD涉及比通常所接受的更为复杂的致病机制。此外,我们的发现增加了EMA或其识别的抗原直接参与CD发病机制的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验