de Castilho L M, Pellegrino J, Bechelli A P, Le Pennec P Y, Mendes N F
Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brasil.
J Clin Lab Anal. 1996;10(5):250-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1996)10:5<250::AID-JCLA4>3.0.CO;2-C.
The sensitivity of the low ionic strength solution antiglobulin test (LISS-AGT), polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test (PEG-AGT), low ionic strength solution solid-phase antiglobulin test (LISS-SPAT), gel low ionic strength solution antiglobulin test (GEL-LISS), and gel papain test (GEL-PAP) was compared in titration studies of 460 sera containing identified IgG alloantibodies. The GEL-PAP was 100% sensitive to detect Rh antibodies, whereas the PEG-AGT was the most sensitive to detect Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Ss, and rare blood group antibodies. The better performance of PEG-AGT was especially obvious with Kell, Duffy, and Ss antibodies (S = 100%). When the sensitivity of the LISS-AGT, PEG-AGT, GEL-LISS, and GEL-PAP was evaluated in different routines, the GEL-LISS showed to be more sensitive than PEG-AGT in the detection of clinically significant antibodies. These discrepant results showed that the performance of a technique may change when it is applied as a routine.
在对460份含有已鉴定IgG同种抗体的血清进行滴定研究时,比较了低离子强度溶液抗球蛋白试验(LISS - AGT)、聚乙二醇抗球蛋白试验(PEG - AGT)、低离子强度溶液固相抗球蛋白试验(LISS - SPAT)、凝胶低离子强度溶液抗球蛋白试验(GEL - LISS)和凝胶木瓜蛋白酶试验(GEL - PAP)的敏感性。GEL - PAP检测Rh抗体的敏感性为100%,而PEG - AGT检测凯尔(Kell)、达菲(Duffy)、基德(Kidd)、Ss及稀有血型抗体最为敏感。PEG - AGT在检测凯尔、达菲和Ss抗体时表现更佳(敏感性 = 100%)。在不同常规检测中评估LISS - AGT、PEG - AGT、GEL - LISS和GEL - PAP的敏感性时,GEL - LISS在检测临床显著抗体方面比PEG - AGT更敏感。这些不一致的结果表明,一项技术在作为常规方法应用时其性能可能会发生变化。