• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对了解个人患癌遗传风险的兴趣:一项普通人群调查。

Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: a general population survey.

作者信息

Andrykowski M A, Munn R K, Studts J L

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington 40536-0086, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):527-36. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0086.

DOI:10.1006/pmed.1996.0086
PMID:8888320
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported high interest in genetic testing for risk for colon or breast-ovarian cancer. These studies, however, have used samples which might be atypical with regard to level of interest evident among the general U.S. population.

METHODS

As part of an annual statewide telephone health survey, adults' (n = 649) interest in learning about their personal genetic predisposition for cancer was assessed.

RESULTS

High levels of interest in learning about a personal genetic predisposition for cancer in general (87%) and breast cancer in particular (93%) were expressed. Logistic regression analysis indicated that lack of interest was associated with less education, minority status, and less performance of other health-protective behaviors. Only 53% of respondents reported their understanding of genetics was "good" or "excellent."

CONCLUSION

While interest in learning of one's personal genetic predisposition for cancer was high, many individuals requesting testing may have a less than good understanding of genetics and the implications of test results. Furthermore, variables associated with lack of interest in learning about personal genetic risk for cancer in this study were similar to those which have been previously found to be associated with poor utilization of other cancer control activities such as breast or cervical cancer screening.

摘要

背景

先前的研究报告称,人们对结肠癌或乳腺癌-卵巢癌风险的基因检测兴趣浓厚。然而,这些研究使用的样本在美国普通人群中可能在兴趣水平方面不具代表性。

方法

作为全州年度电话健康调查的一部分,评估了成年人(n = 649)了解自身癌症遗传易感性的兴趣。

结果

总体而言,人们对了解自身癌症遗传易感性(87%)尤其是乳腺癌遗传易感性(93%)兴趣浓厚。逻辑回归分析表明,缺乏兴趣与教育程度较低、少数族裔身份以及较少进行其他健康保护行为有关。只有53%的受访者表示他们对遗传学的理解为“良好”或“优秀”。

结论

虽然人们对了解自身癌症遗传易感性兴趣浓厚,但许多要求进行检测的人对遗传学以及检测结果的影响可能了解不足。此外,本研究中与缺乏了解自身癌症遗传风险兴趣相关的变量,与先前发现的与乳腺癌或宫颈癌筛查等其他癌症控制活动利用率低相关的变量相似。

相似文献

1
Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: a general population survey.对了解个人患癌遗传风险的兴趣:一项普通人群调查。
Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):527-36. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0086.
2
Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.女性对乳腺癌风险基因检测的兴趣:社会人口统计学和知识的影响
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jan;11(1):89-95.
3
How interested is the public in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility? Report of a cross-sectional population survey.公众对结肠癌易感性基因检测的兴趣如何?一项横断面人群调查的报告。
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Aug;2(4):167-72.
4
Beliefs and interest in cancer risk in an underserved Latino cohort.一个服务不足的拉丁裔队列对癌症风险的认知与兴趣。
Prev Med. 2007 Mar;44(3):241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.08.018. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
5
Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: survey of relatives of colon cancer patients.对结肠癌基因检测的态度:结肠癌患者亲属的调查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):337-44.
6
Perceptions of genetic testing for cancer predisposition among Ashkenazi Jewish women.德系犹太人女性对癌症易感性基因检测的认知
Community Genet. 2007;10(2):72-81. doi: 10.1159/000099084.
7
Women's awareness of ovarian cancer risks and symptoms.女性对卵巢癌风险和症状的认识。
Am J Nurs. 2009 Sep;109(9):36-45; quiz 46. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000360309.08701.73.
8
Information seeking and intentions to have genetic testing for hereditary cancers in rural and Appalachian Kentuckians.肯塔基州农村和阿巴拉契亚地区居民对遗传性癌症进行基因检测的信息寻求情况及意愿。
J Rural Health. 2007 Spring;23(2):166-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00085.x.
9
[Knowledge, attitude and behavior about the inherited predisposition to cancer. A survery of a population without any history of cancer in central Tunisia].[关于癌症遗传易感性的知识、态度和行为。突尼斯中部无癌症病史人群的一项调查]
Tunis Med. 2005 May;83(5):262-8.
10
Predictors of self-referral into a cancer genetics registry.自我转诊至癌症遗传学登记处的预测因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jul;16(7):1387-92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0009.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes Toward Glaucoma Genetic Risk Assessment in Unaffected Individuals.对未受影响个体的青光眼遗传风险评估的态度。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):38. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.38.
2
Understanding Medical Mistrust in Black Women at Risk of BRCA 1/2 Mutations.了解有BRCA 1/2基因突变风险的黑人女性对医疗的不信任
J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2019 Fall;12(3):35-47.
3
Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers towards genetic testing across three rural Illinois communities.伊利诺伊州三个乡村社区对基因检测的知识、态度及感知到的障碍
J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00407-w. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
4
Recontacting Patients with Updated Genetic Testing Recommendations for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma.重新联系接受过更新的基因检测建议的甲状腺髓样癌、嗜铬细胞瘤或副神经节瘤患者。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1395-1402. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6366-0. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Attitudes to incorporating genomic risk assessments into population screening programs: the importance of purpose, context and deliberation.对将基因组风险评估纳入人群筛查项目的态度:目的、背景和审议的重要性。
BMC Med Genomics. 2016 May 23;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0186-5.
6
Patient knowledge and information-seeking about personalized cancer therapy.患者对个性化癌症治疗的了解及信息寻求情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Factors Influencing Men's Interest in Gene Testing for Prostate Cancer Susceptibility.影响男性对前列腺癌易感性基因检测兴趣的因素。
J Genet Couns. 2002 Oct;11(5):383-98. doi: 10.1023/A:1016889614588.
8
The Impact of Test Outcome Certainty on Interest in Genetic Testing Among College Women.检测结果确定性对大学女生基因检测兴趣的影响
J Genet Couns. 2003 Apr;12(2):131-50. doi: 10.1023/A:1022607223097.
9
The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics.人类基因组计划以及个性化基因组学的最新进展。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Feb 16;8:9-20. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S58728. eCollection 2015.
10
Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.美国一个基于概率的在线样本中遗传性结直肠癌基因检测的价值。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug 1;35(6):734-744. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14565820. Epub 2015 Jan 14.