Barth W, Löwel H, Lewis M, Classen E, Herman B, Quietzsch D, Greiser E, Keil U, Heinemann L, Voigt G, Brasche S, Böthig S
Centre for Epidemiology and Health Research, Zepernick, Germany.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1277-84. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00024-8.
Cardiovascular mortality (CVD; International Classification of Diseases [ICD] 390-458) is higher in East than in West Germany, but the differences in official coronary heart disease mortality (CHD; ICD 410-414) are not so pronounced. The aim of this study was to validate the official mortality statistics based on the five German AMI registers and to analyze whether these mortality differences are due to differences in the attack rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or to differences in the 28-day case fatality rates. This comparison includes the MONICA study cities of Augsburg and Bremen, both in West Germany, as well as the cities of Chemnitz, Erfurt, and Zwickau in East Germany (former the German Democratic Republic). The rates were calculated on the basis of all MONICA cases of definite AMI or coronary death aged 35 to 64 years occurring in the respective study populations between 1985 and 1989. All study populations except women in Augsburg showed higher coronary death rates compared to the rates based on the official cause of death statistics (ICD 410-414), but this difference was significant only for men in Chemnitz. In men there were no significant differences in the register-based coronary death rates between these urban areas (160/100,000 in Zwickau to 170/100,000 in Chemnitz) nor in the AMI attack rates (327/100,000 in Augsburg to 363/100,000 in Chemnitz), and consequently no significant center differences in the overall 28-day case fatality. However, the prehospital case fatality was significantly higher in Erfurt (34%) than in Bremen (27%). There were no significant differences in the AMI attack rates in women as well (60/100,000 in Chemnitz to 70/100,000 in Bremen and Erfurt), but the overall 28-day case fatality showed a clear gradient from the East (61-71%) to the West German cities (48-56%) and therefore also the register-based coronary death rates (38-50/100,000 and 34-38/100,000, respectively). However, the higher 28-day case fatality in women found in the MONICA registers in East compared to West Germany is not reflected in the CHD mortality statistics because of a stronger underestimation of the official mortality rates and in East than in West Germany, in particular in women. Nevertheless, the total mortality rates and in most cases also the CVD mortality rates were in women significantly higher in the East German compared to the West German cities. The East German official preunification CHD mortality data cannot be used for national and international comparisons. The results of the MONICA AMI registers in East and West Germany indicate, furthermore, the need to improve coronary care in women in the eastern part of the country. Nevertheless, because of the relatively high AMI attack rate in both parts of Germany primary prevention must generally be intensified.
东德的心血管疾病死亡率(CVD;国际疾病分类[ICD]390 - 458)高于西德,但官方统计的冠心病死亡率(CHD;ICD 410 - 414)差异并不那么显著。本研究的目的是基于德国五个急性心肌梗死(AMI)登记处的数据验证官方死亡率统计,并分析这些死亡率差异是由于急性心肌梗死发病率的差异还是28天病死率的差异。此次比较包括西德的奥格斯堡和不来梅这两个莫尼卡研究城市,以及东德(前德意志民主共和国)的开姆尼茨、爱尔福特和茨维考市。发病率是根据1985年至1989年期间各研究人群中所有年龄在35至64岁的确诊AMI或冠心病死亡的莫尼卡病例计算得出的。除奥格斯堡的女性外,所有研究人群的冠心病死亡率均高于基于官方死因统计(ICD 410 - 414)的死亡率,但这种差异仅在开姆尼茨的男性中显著。在男性中,这些城市地区基于登记处的冠心病死亡率(茨维考为160/10万,开姆尼茨为170/10万)以及AMI发病率(奥格斯堡为327/10万,开姆尼茨为363/10万)均无显著差异,因此在总体28天病死率方面也无显著的中心差异。然而,爱尔福特的院前病死率(34%)显著高于不来梅(27%)。女性的AMI发病率也无显著差异(开姆尼茨为60/10万,不来梅和爱尔福特为70/10万),但总体28天病死率呈现出从东德城市(61 - 71%)到西德城市(48 - 56%)的明显梯度,基于登记处的冠心病死亡率也是如此(分别为38 - 50/10万和34 - 38/10万)。然而,由于官方死亡率在东德比西德被更严重地低估,尤其是在女性中,莫尼卡登记处中东德女性较高的28天病死率并未反映在CHD死亡率统计中。尽管如此,东德女性的总死亡率以及在大多数情况下的CVD死亡率均显著高于西德城市。东德统一前的官方CHD死亡率数据不能用于国内和国际比较。此外,东德和西德莫尼卡AMI登记处的结果表明,该国东部地区需要改善对女性的冠心病护理。不过,由于德国两部分地区的AMI发病率相对较高,总体上必须加强一级预防。