• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

醋氯芬酸与替诺昔康治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性比较研究

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and tenoxicam in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Perez-Ruiz F, Alonso-Ruiz A, Ansoleaga J J

机构信息

Rheumatology Section, Hospital de Cruces, Vizcaya, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Sep;15(5):473-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02229644.

DOI:10.1007/BF02229644
PMID:8894360
Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac (AC) and tenoxicam (TX) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a multicentric parallel, randomized, double-blind trial of three months duration was performed in 292 patients: 145 were randomized to the AC treatment group and 147 to the TX treatment group. The trial was completed by 237 (81.1%) patients. Both treatment groups showed amelioration of clinical parameters monitored at 15 days, and this improvement continued until the end of the trial, no statistically significant differences being observed between AC and TX. Twenty-four patients (8.2%, 12 AC and 12 TX) did not complete the trial because of inefficacy, and 15 because of side effects (5.1%, 6 AC and 9 TX), in 7 of them due to gastrointestinal intolerance (2,4%, 1 AC, 6 TX, p = 0.052). These data demonstrate that AC shows similar efficacy to TX in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and better safety profile than TX, mainly regarding gastrointestinal tolerability.

摘要

为比较醋氯芬酸(AC)和替诺昔康(TX)治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效和安全性,对292例患者进行了一项为期三个月的多中心平行、随机、双盲试验:145例随机分为AC治疗组,147例随机分为TX治疗组。237例(81.1%)患者完成了试验。两个治疗组在15天时监测的临床参数均有改善,且这种改善持续到试验结束,AC和TX之间未观察到统计学显著差异。24例患者(8.2%,AC组12例,TX组12例)因无效未完成试验,15例(5.1%,AC组6例,TX组9例)因副作用未完成试验,其中7例(2.4%,AC组1例,TX组6例,p = 0.052)因胃肠道不耐受。这些数据表明,AC在治疗类风湿关节炎方面显示出与TX相似的疗效,且安全性优于TX,主要体现在胃肠道耐受性方面。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and tenoxicam in rheumatoid arthritis.醋氯芬酸与替诺昔康治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性比较研究
Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Sep;15(5):473-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02229644.
2
A comparison of tenoxicam and piroxicam in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1992 Apr;19(4):538-42.
3
A study to determine the efficacy and safety of tenoxicam versus piroxicam, diclofenac and indomethacin in patients with osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.
J Rheumatol. 1993 Dec;20(12):2095-103.
4
Aceclofenac in comparison to ketoprofen in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.双氯芬酸与酮洛芬治疗类风湿性关节炎的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 1995;15(3):111-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00302127.
5
Aceclofenac is as safe and effective as tenoxicam in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a 3 month multicenter comparative trial. Spanish Study Group on Aceclofenac in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;23(7):1194-9.
6
[Comparative study of the occurrence of gastrointestinal side-effects of tenoxicam and other nonsteroidal antirheumatic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].[类风湿关节炎患者中替诺昔康与其他非甾体类抗风湿药胃肠道副作用发生率的比较研究]
Reumatizam. 1996;43(1):1-9.
7
A large multicentre, parallel group, double-blind study comparing tenoxicam and piroxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Br J Clin Pract. 1989 Sep;43(9):328-33.
8
A multi-centre, double-blind comparative study of the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and diclofenac in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.醋氯芬酸与双氯芬酸治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效及安全性的多中心、双盲对照研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 1995;13(6):305-15. doi: 10.1185/03007999509110491.
9
A multicenter study of tenoxicam and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.一项关于替诺昔康和双氯芬酸治疗膝骨关节炎患者的多中心研究。
J Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;20(6):999-1004.
10
Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind comparative clinical trial versus diclofenac - an Indian experience.醋氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:与双氯芬酸对比的随机双盲对照临床试验——一项印度的研究经验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):977-88. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104722.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of 4-week therapy with aceclofenac controlled release once a day.一天一次服用醋氯芬酸控释片 4 周的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;12(1):16519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20633-6.
2
A Review of Aceclofenac: Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Musculoskeletal Disorders.醋氯芬酸综述:对肌肉骨骼疾病的镇痛和抗炎作用
J Pain Res. 2021 Nov 30;14:3651-3663. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S326101. eCollection 2021.
3
Development and Characterization of Eudragit-RL-100-Based Aceclofenac Sustained-Release Matrix Pellets Prepared via Extrusion/Spheronization.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events in methotrexate-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎患者的不良事件。
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;34 Suppl 2:49-56.
2
Aspirin in rheumatoid arthritis, a seven-day, double-blind trial--preliminary report.阿司匹林治疗类风湿性关节炎的七天双盲试验——初步报告。
Bull Rheum Dis. 1965 Nov;16(3):388-91.
3
Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.一项使用关节指数评估类风湿关节炎患者关节压痛情况的临床研究。
通过挤出/滚圆法制备的基于Eudragit-RL-100的醋氯芬酸缓释骨架微丸的研制与表征
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 21;13(22):4034. doi: 10.3390/polym13224034.
4
Use of corticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎治疗中皮质激素和非甾体类抗炎药的应用:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0248866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248866. eCollection 2021.
5
Pharmacokinetics and Anti-Gastric Ulceration Activity of Oral Administration of Aceclofenac and Esomeprazole in Rats.大鼠口服醋氯芬酸和埃索美拉唑的药代动力学及抗胃溃疡活性
Pharmaceutics. 2018 Sep 6;10(3):152. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030152.
6
Pain management for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and other spondylarthritis) and gastrointestinal or liver comorbidity.炎症性关节炎(类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎、强直性脊柱炎及其他脊柱关节炎)与胃肠道或肝脏合并症的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008951.pub2.
7
Pharmacokinetics of a new once-daily controlled-release formulation of aceclofenac in Korean healthy subjects compared with immediate-release aceclofenac and the effect of food: a randomized, open-label, three-period, crossover, single-centre study.在韩国健康受试者中比较新型每日一次控释制剂醋氯芬酸与普通制剂醋氯芬酸及食物影响的药代动力学:一项随机、开放标签、三周期、交叉、单中心研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Feb 1;32(2):111-9. doi: 10.2165/11596530-000000000-00000.
8
Aceclofenac: a reappraisal of its use in the management of pain and rheumatic disease.醋氯芬酸:对其在疼痛和风湿性疾病管理中应用的重新评估
Drugs. 2001;61(9):1351-78. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161090-00012.
Q J Med. 1968 Jul;37(147):393-406.
4
The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.美国风湿病协会1987年修订的类风湿关节炎分类标准。
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302.
5
[Calculating the number of patients necessary for designing a clinical study].
Med Clin (Barc). 1989 Jan 21;92(2):72-7.
6
A large multicentre, parallel group, double-blind study comparing tenoxicam and piroxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Br J Clin Pract. 1989 Sep;43(9):328-33.
7
A study of the safety of tenoxicam in general practice.一项关于替诺昔康在全科医疗中安全性的研究。
N Z Med J. 1989 Nov 8;102(879):582-3.
8
The pharmacological profile of aceclofenac, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory and analgesic drug.
Agents Actions Suppl. 1991;32:125-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7405-2_17.
9
Pharmacology of the potent new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent aceclofenac.新型强效非甾体抗炎药醋氯芬酸的药理学
Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 Dec;41(12):1265-76.
10
A comparison of tenoxicam and piroxicam in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1992 Apr;19(4):538-42.