Suppr超能文献

早期乳腺癌的卵巢去势:随机试验综述。早期乳腺癌试验者协作组

Ovarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

出版信息

Lancet. 1996 Nov 2;348(9036):1189-96.

PMID:8898035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among women with early breast cancer, the effects of ovarian ablation on recurrence and death have been assessed by several randomised trials that now have long follow-up. In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their third 5-yearly systematic overview (meta-analysis), now with 15 years' follow-up.

METHODS

In 1995, information was sought on each patient in any randomised trial of ovarian ablation or suppression versus control that began before 1990. Data were obtained for 12 of the 13 studies that assessed ovarian ablation by irradiation or surgery, all of which began before 1980, but not for the four studies that assessed ovarian suppression by drugs, all of which began after 1985. Menopausal status was not consistently defined across trials; therefore, the main analyses are limited to women aged under 50 (rather than "premenopausal") when randomised. Oestrogen receptors were measured only in the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone.

FINDINGS

Among 2102 women aged under 50 when randomised, most of whom would have been premenopausal at diagnosis, 1130 deaths and an additional 153 recurrences were reported. 15-year survival was highly significantly improved among those allocated ovarian ablation (52.4 vs 46.1%, 6.3 [SD 2.3] fewer deaths per 100 women, logrank 2p = 0.001), as was recurrence-free survival (45.0 vs 39.0%, 2p = 0.0007). The numbers of events were too small for any subgroup analyses to be reliable. The benefit was, however, significant both for those with ("node positive") and for those without ("node negative") axillary spread when diagnosed. In the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone, the benefit appeared smaller (even for women with oestrogen receptors detected on the primary tumour) than in the trials of ablation in the absence of chemotherapy (where the observed survival improvements were about six per 100 node-negative women and 12 per 100 node-positive women). Among 1354 women aged 50 or over when randomised, most of whom would have been perimenopausal or postmenopausal, there was only a nonsignificant improvement in survival and recurrence-free survival.

INTERPRETATION

In women aged under 50 with early breast cancer, ablation of functioning ovaries significantly improves long-term survival, at least in the absence of chemotherapy. Further randomised evidence is needed on the additional effects of ovarian ablation in the presence of other adjuvant treatments, and to assess the relevance of hormone-receptor measurements.

摘要

背景

在早期乳腺癌女性患者中,多项随机试验已对卵巢去势对复发和死亡的影响进行了评估,目前这些试验已有长期随访数据。在本报告中,早期乳腺癌试验者协作组公布了他们的第三次五年期系统综述(荟萃分析),此次随访时间长达15年。

方法

1995年,我们搜集了1990年之前开始的任何一项卵巢去势或抑制与对照组比较的随机试验中每位患者的信息。在评估通过放疗或手术进行卵巢去势的13项研究中,我们获得了其中12项研究的数据,所有这些研究均在1980年之前开始,但未获得评估药物抑制卵巢功能的4项研究的数据,所有这些研究均在1985年之后开始。各试验对绝经状态的定义并不一致;因此,主要分析仅限于随机分组时年龄在50岁以下(而非“绝经前”)的女性。仅在去势加细胞毒性化疗与单纯相同化疗的试验中测量了雌激素受体。

结果

在随机分组时年龄在50岁以下的2102名女性中,大多数在诊断时可能处于绝经前状态,报告了1130例死亡和另外153例复发。接受卵巢去势的患者15年生存率显著提高(52.4%对46.1%,每100名女性死亡人数减少6.3[标准差2.3],对数秩检验2p = 0.001),无复发生存率也显著提高(45.0%对39.0%,2p = 0.0007)。事件数量太少,无法进行任何可靠的亚组分析。然而,对于诊断时有腋窝淋巴结转移(“淋巴结阳性”)和无腋窝淋巴结转移(“淋巴结阴性”)的患者,这种益处均显著。在去势加细胞毒性化疗与单纯相同化疗的试验中,益处似乎较小(即使对于原发肿瘤检测到雌激素受体的女性也是如此),低于未进行化疗的去势试验(在未进行化疗的试验中,观察到的生存改善约为每100名淋巴结阴性女性6例,每100名淋巴结阳性女性12例)。在随机分组时年龄在50岁及以上的1354名女性中,大多数可能处于围绝经期或绝经后状态,其生存率和无复发生存率仅有不显著的改善。

解读

在年龄小于50岁的早期乳腺癌女性中,切除有功能的卵巢可显著提高长期生存率,至少在未进行化疗的情况下如此。需要进一步的随机证据来研究在存在其他辅助治疗时卵巢去势的额外效果,并评估激素受体测量的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验