Moore T M, Khimenko P L, Taylor A E
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688, USA.
Chin J Physiol. 1996;39(2):65-81.
Not all possible mediators of lung I/R injury that have been studied, such as cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase products, have been presented in this review, but it is very clear that oxygen free radicals are the primary mediators of the damage, regardless of their origin. Oxygen radicals are generated by neutrophils, which are sequestered and activated in the ischemic-reperfused pulmonary tissue, and by xanthine oxidase, which is upregulated by ischemia and/or activated neutrophils. The contributions to lung injury by different species of oxygen radicals may very depending upon the lung model used to study I/R. Also, nitric oxide may be injurious or protective in lung I/R injury, depending upon some critical alveolar PO2 level present either during ischemia or at reperfusion. I/R-induced lung microvascular injury ultimately depends upon some balance between lung metabolic stress, the extent of the I/R-induced inflammatory response, endogenous antioxidant levels, and the timing, magnitude, and duration of oxygen free radical generation during both periods of ischemia and reperfusion. The final common pathway causing microvascular permeability to increase after lung I/R is the activation of the endothelial cell's contractile machinery. Particularly, endothelial contraction may occur in a MLCK-dependent fashion. Endothelial contraction may also be related to an intracellular Ca++ increase and subsequent calmodulin activation. The initiating event causing increased intracellular Ca++ is not known, but may be due to endothelial cell/leukocyte interactions, oxygen radical-mediated Ca++ transients, mobilization of intracellular Ca++ pools by various second messengers, or stimulation of Ca++ influx secondarily to changes in the activity of membrane ion pumps such as the Na+/H+ antiport. Increasing cAMP levels in the postischemic lung can prevent and actually reverse I/R-induced microvascular injury, by affecting MLCK, the endothelial cell cytoskeleton, and/or the function of sequestered leukocytes. Also, cAMP elevation aids the resolution of pulmonary edema by facilitating capillary fluid reabsorption. Whatever the mechanism, elevation of cAMP in the setting of lung I/R injury represents a potentially useful therapy for improving early lung function following lung transplantation. Finally, additional studies are necessary to elucidate the complete mechanisms responsible for producing microvascular injury during lung I/R. Specifically, a better understanding of the relationships between the many factors required to produce lung damage is needed. Many interventions into the lung I/R process provide protection against microvascular injury, suggesting that regulation of the endothelial barrier permeability to fluid, protein, and leukocytes is accomplished by several redundant systems. This situation may be similar to mechanisms reported to regulate the immune response mediated by T cells (62a), where T cell activation depends upon multiple signal inputs for the full immune response to occur. Thus, multiple signals in a correct sequence delivered to the endothelium may be necessary to produce the microvascular injury associated with lung ischemia and reperfusion.
并非所有已研究的肺缺血/再灌注损伤的潜在介质,如环氧化酶和脂氧化酶产物,都在本综述中呈现,但很明显,氧自由基是损伤的主要介质,无论其来源如何。氧自由基由在缺血再灌注肺组织中被隔离和激活的中性粒细胞产生,也由因缺血上调和/或被激活的中性粒细胞激活的黄嘌呤氧化酶产生。不同种类的氧自由基对肺损伤的作用可能因用于研究缺血/再灌注的肺模型而异。此外,一氧化氮在肺缺血/再灌注损伤中可能具有损伤作用或保护作用,这取决于缺血期间或再灌注时存在的某些关键肺泡氧分压水平。缺血/再灌注诱导的肺微血管损伤最终取决于肺代谢应激、缺血/再灌注诱导的炎症反应程度、内源性抗氧化剂水平以及缺血和再灌注期间氧自由基产生的时间、幅度和持续时间之间的某种平衡。肺缺血/再灌注后导致微血管通透性增加的最终共同途径是内皮细胞收缩机制的激活。特别是,内皮收缩可能以依赖肌球蛋白轻链激酶的方式发生。内皮收缩也可能与细胞内钙离子增加及随后的钙调蛋白激活有关。导致细胞内钙离子增加的起始事件尚不清楚,但可能是由于内皮细胞/白细胞相互作用、氧自由基介导的钙离子瞬变、各种第二信使动员细胞内钙离子库,或继发于膜离子泵(如钠/氢反向转运体)活性变化的钙离子内流刺激。在缺血后肺中提高环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)水平可通过影响肌球蛋白轻链激酶、内皮细胞细胞骨架和/或被隔离白细胞的功能来预防并实际上逆转缺血/再灌注诱导的微血管损伤。此外,cAMP升高通过促进毛细血管液体重吸收有助于肺水肿的消退。无论机制如何,在肺缺血/再灌注损伤情况下提高cAMP水平代表了一种潜在有用的治疗方法,可改善肺移植后的早期肺功能。最后,需要进行更多研究以阐明肺缺血/再灌注期间产生微血管损伤的完整机制。具体而言,需要更好地理解导致肺损伤所需的众多因素之间的关系。对肺缺血/再灌注过程的许多干预措施可提供针对微血管损伤的保护,这表明对内皮屏障对液体、蛋白质和白细胞的通透性的调节是由几个冗余系统完成的。这种情况可能类似于据报道调节由T细胞介导的免疫反应的机制(62a),其中T细胞激活取决于多个信号输入才能发生完全的免疫反应。因此,可能需要以正确顺序传递给内皮细胞的多个信号才能产生与肺缺血和再灌注相关的微血管损伤。