Krovat B C, Jantsch M F
Department of Cytology and Genetics, Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
J Biol Chem. 1996 Nov 8;271(45):28112-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28112.
Xenopus laevis RNA-binding protein A is a ubiquitously expressed, double-stranded RNA-binding protein that is associated with the majority of cellular RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and hnRNAs. X. laevis RNA-binding protein A contains three copies of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) in tandem arrangement. Two of them, xl1 and xl2, belong to the type A group of dsRBDs that show strong homologies to the entire length of a defined consensus sequence. The xl3 domain, in contrast, is a type B dsRBD which only matches the basic C-terminal end of the dsRBD consensus sequence. Here we show that only xl2 but neither xl1 nor xl3 are able to bind double-stranded RNA substrates in vitro, suggesting that different dsRBD copies have varying RNA binding activities. By fine mapping mutagenesis of the isolated xl2 domain, we identified at least two central aromatic amino acids and a C-terminal alpha-helix that are indispensable for dsRNA binding. Furthermore, we show that different charge distributions within the C-terminal alpha-helices of xl1 and xl2 seem responsible for the different RNA binding behaviors of these two dsRBDs. Analyses of the RNA binding properties of constructs containing various combinations of different dsRBDs reveal that type A dsRBDs exhibit a cooperative binding effect, whereas type B dsRBDs show a rather low binding activity, thus contributing only to a minor extent to a stable RNA-protein interaction.
非洲爪蟾RNA结合蛋白A是一种广泛表达的双链RNA结合蛋白,与大多数细胞RNA、核糖体RNA和核内不均一RNA相关联。非洲爪蟾RNA结合蛋白A包含三个串联排列的双链RNA结合结构域(dsRBD)拷贝。其中两个,xl1和xl2,属于A类dsRBD,它们与一个确定的共有序列的全长具有很强的同源性。相比之下,xl3结构域是B类dsRBD,它只与dsRBD共有序列的基本C末端匹配。在这里我们表明,在体外只有xl2能够结合双链RNA底物,而xl1和xl3都不能,这表明不同的dsRBD拷贝具有不同的RNA结合活性。通过对分离的xl2结构域进行精细定位诱变,我们确定了至少两个中心芳香族氨基酸和一个C末端α螺旋,它们对于dsRNA结合是必不可少的。此外,我们表明xl1和xl2的C末端α螺旋内不同的电荷分布似乎是这两个dsRBD不同RNA结合行为的原因。对包含不同dsRBD各种组合的构建体的RNA结合特性分析表明,A类dsRBD表现出协同结合效应,而B类dsRBD显示出相当低的结合活性,因此仅在很小程度上有助于稳定的RNA-蛋白质相互作用。