Suppr超能文献

腔静脉阻断术前的腔静脉双功成像

Vena cava duplex imaging before caval interruption.

作者信息

Friedland M, Kazmers A, Kline R, Groehn H, Meeker C, Despriet S, Abson K, Oust G

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Harper Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 Oct;24(4):608-12; discussion 612-3. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70076-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Venacavograms are routinely obtained before vena cava filter placement to evaluate cava size, patency, and the presence of thrombus or venous anomalies. The objective of this study was to determine the ability of duplex ultrasonography to adequately evaluate the inferior vena cava (IVC) for size, patency, and the presence of thrombus before Greenfield filter (GF) insertion.

METHODS

Duplex ultrasonographic scans were performed in 40 patients who had documented lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis diagnosed by duplex scan before GF placement. The infrarenal transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the IVC were measured, and the entire IVC was imaged for patency and the presence of thrombus or anomalies. Preoperative venacavograms were not obtained in any patients who had GFs placed in the operating room, but was performed during surgery during filter insertion. An additional 26 patients who had deep venous thrombosis and did not have caval interruption underwent IVC duplex to determine the patency and proximal extent of venous thrombosis.

RESULTS

The indications for GF placement were contraindication to anticoagulation in 72.5% (29 patients); five filters were placed prophylactically; three for failure of anticoagulation; two after a complication of anticoagulation; and one before pulmonary embolectomy. The filters were placed in the operating room by surgeons in 82.5% of patients, with the remainder inserted in an angiography suite by an interventional radiologist. The ability of duplex to measure a transverse diameter of 26 mm or less had a sensitivity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 100%, and overall accuracy of 97.5% using venacavography as the standard. Measurements of IVC diameter by duplex correlated with those based on venacavograms (r = 0.766; p < 0.001). Of the entire group of 66 IVC duplex examinations, one (1.5%) was incomplete because of technical limitations. IVC thrombus was noted by duplex in two patients who underwent GF insertion, which was confirmed with venacavography. No IVC anomalies were noted by duplex scans or venacavograms.

CONCLUSION

Duplex ultrasonography is a useful and accurate method for assessment of the IVC before vena cava filter placement.

摘要

目的

在放置腔静脉滤器前常规进行腔静脉造影,以评估腔静脉大小、通畅情况以及血栓或静脉异常的存在。本研究的目的是确定在植入格林菲尔德滤器(GF)之前,双功超声检查评估下腔静脉(IVC)大小、通畅情况以及血栓存在的能力。

方法

对40例在植入GF之前经双功超声检查确诊为下肢深静脉血栓形成的患者进行双功超声扫描。测量IVC肾下横径和前后径,并对整个IVC成像以评估通畅情况以及血栓或异常的存在。在手术室植入GF的任何患者均未进行术前腔静脉造影,但在滤器植入手术过程中进行了造影。另外26例患有深静脉血栓形成且未进行腔静脉阻断的患者接受了IVC双功超声检查,以确定静脉血栓的通畅情况和近端范围。

结果

植入GF的指征为72.5%(29例)患者存在抗凝禁忌证;预防性植入5个滤器;3个因抗凝失败植入;2个在抗凝并发症后植入;1个在肺栓子切除术之前植入。82.5%的患者由外科医生在手术室植入滤器,其余由介入放射科医生在血管造影室植入。以腔静脉造影为标准,双功超声测量横径26mm或更小的能力,敏感性为97.5%,阳性预测值为100%,总体准确性为97.5%。双功超声测量的IVC直径与基于腔静脉造影测量的结果相关(r = 0.766;p < 0.001)。在整个66例IVC双功超声检查组中,1例(1.5%)因技术限制而不完整。在2例接受GF植入的患者中,双功超声检查发现IVC血栓,腔静脉造影证实。双功超声扫描或腔静脉造影均未发现IVC异常。

结论

双功超声检查是放置腔静脉滤器前评估IVC的一种有用且准确的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验