Kazmers A, Groehn H, Meeker C
Harper Hospital & Division of Vascular Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Am Surg. 2000 Oct;66(10):986-9.
Duplex examination of the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed in 270 patients from 1/1/96 to 1/1/00 to define suitability of the IVC for caval interruption using noninvasive means. The IVC was interrogated using a 3-mHz curved linear array probe and an ATL Ultramark 9 ultrasound machine (Bothell, WA). Duplex measured IVC dimensions and defined presence of thrombus or anomalies. Of the 270 IVC duplex examinations 10.7 per cent (n = 29) could not be completed because of overlying bowel gas or for other technical reasons. Of the 241 completed studies 4.1 per cent (n = 10) revealed acute or chronic thrombosis of the IVC. The lateral diameter of the IVC was 20.3 +/- 4.4 mm (95% confidence interval 19.8-20.9 mm), whereas the anteroposterior diameter was 12.6 +/- 4.0 mm (95% confidence interval 12.1-13.1 mm). Excluding those with vena cava thrombosis maximum vena cava diameters exceeded 28 mm in only 2.2 per cent (n = 5) of those with technically adequate studies. Apart from the latter megacavas there were no major IVC anomalies detected. For those with incomplete studies body weight was 192 +/- 59 lb versus 169 +/- 38 lb for those with technically adequate studies (P = 0.008). Technically adequate vena cava duplex examinations can be performed in 89 per cent of patients. On the basis of this and one prior study done at this center IVC duplex can define vena cava dimensions and presence of thrombus. Using the standard criteria for IVC filter insertion that require presence of a maximum cava diameter < or = 28 mm and absence of caval thrombus or anomalies, 94 per cent (226 of 241) of those with complete duplex examinations would have been anatomically suitable for standard Greenfield filter insertion based on noninvasive testing.
1996年1月1日至2000年1月1日期间,对270例患者进行了下腔静脉(IVC)的双功超声检查,以确定使用非侵入性方法进行下腔静脉阻断的适用性。使用3兆赫的弯曲线阵探头和ATL Ultramark 9超声仪(华盛顿州博塞尔)对下腔静脉进行检查。双功超声测量下腔静脉的尺寸,并确定是否存在血栓或异常情况。在270例下腔静脉双功超声检查中,10.7%(n = 29)因肠道气体干扰或其他技术原因未能完成检查。在241例完成的检查中,4.1%(n = 10)显示下腔静脉存在急性或慢性血栓形成。下腔静脉的横向直径为20.3±4.4毫米(95%置信区间19.8 - 20.9毫米),而前后径为12.6±4.0毫米(95%置信区间12.1 - 13.1毫米)。排除患有腔静脉血栓形成的患者后,在技术上检查充分的患者中,只有2.2%(n = 5)的下腔静脉最大直径超过28毫米。除了后者的巨腔静脉外,未检测到其他主要的下腔静脉异常情况。对于检查未完成的患者,体重为192±59磅,而技术上检查充分的患者体重为169±38磅(P = 0.008)。89%的患者能够进行技术上充分的腔静脉双功超声检查。基于此项研究以及该中心之前进行的一项研究,下腔静脉双功超声检查可以确定腔静脉的尺寸以及血栓的存在情况。使用下腔静脉滤器置入的标准标准,即要求最大腔静脉直径≤28毫米且不存在腔静脉血栓或异常情况,94%(241例中的226例)完成双功超声检查的患者在解剖学上适合基于非侵入性检测进行标准的格林菲尔德滤器置入。