Prescott L E, Simmonds P, Lai C L, Chan N K, Pike I, Yap P L, Lin C K
Edinburgh and South East Scotland Blood Transfusion Service, United Kingdom.
J Med Virol. 1996 Oct;50(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199610)50:2<168::AID-JMV10>3.0.CO;2-I.
The genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was investigated in 212 viraemic blood donors from Hong Kong. A subset of the samples was investigated using three different genotyping assays to establish the accuracy of each in this population. These assays were restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of amplified 5' noncoding region (5'NCR) sequences, RFLP of the core region, and a serotyping assay using peptides from two antigenic regions of NS4. Genotypes detected in Hong Kong blood donors were 1a (6.2%), 1b (58.8%), 2a (1.4%), 2b (1.4%), 3a (1.9%), and 6a (27.0%). All genotyping assays produced concordant results. No evidence was obtained for the presence of type 6 group variants recently identified in Southeast Asia, other than type 6a. A serotyping assay based upon the detection of type-specific antibody to epitopes in NS4 produced similar results to the genotyping assays (98% concordance), but a reduced sensitivity (75%) compared with genotyping methods. Sequence variation in NS4 was not the cause of the reduced rate of detection of type 6 antibody in this population. Eighty-four percent donors infected with type 6a were male, compared to 75% donors infected with type 1b. The median alanine transaminase (ALT) level in type 6 infected donors was lower than in type 1b, (43.8 and 51.1 U/l, respectively) although these values were not statistically significant (P = 0.094). There was no significant difference between the ages of donors infected with types 1b and 6a. Risk factors for HCV infection in the blood donors included blood transfusion, intravenous drug abuse, and tattooing. A significantly greater number of donors infected with HCV-6a reported a history of drug abuse (66%) than donors infected with HCV-1b (7%).
对来自香港的212名病毒血症献血者的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型分布进行了调查。使用三种不同的基因分型检测方法对一部分样本进行检测,以确定每种方法在该人群中的准确性。这些检测方法包括扩增的5'非编码区(5'NCR)序列的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)、核心区的RFLP以及使用来自NS4两个抗原区的肽进行的血清分型检测。在香港献血者中检测到的基因型为1a(6.2%)、1b(58.8%)、2a(1.4%)、2b(1.4%)、3a(1.9%)和6a(27.0%)。所有基因分型检测结果一致。除6a型外,未获得在东南亚最近鉴定出的6型组变体存在的证据。基于检测针对NS4中表位的型特异性抗体的血清分型检测结果与基因分型检测结果相似(一致性为98%),但与基因分型方法相比灵敏度降低(75%)。NS4中的序列变异不是该人群中6型抗体检测率降低的原因。感染6a型的献血者中84%为男性,而感染1b型的献血者中这一比例为75%。感染6型的献血者的丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)中位数水平低于感染1b型的献血者(分别为43.8和51.1 U/l),尽管这些值无统计学意义(P = 0.094)。感染1b型和6a型的献血者年龄无显著差异。献血者中HCV感染的危险因素包括输血、静脉药物滥用和纹身。报告有药物滥用史的感染HCV - 6a的献血者数量(66%)显著多于感染HCV - 1b的献血者(7%)。