Jankiewicz A, Aulepp H, Baltes W, Bögl K W, Dehne L I, Zuberbier T, Vieths S
Institute of Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1996 Nov;111(3):268-78. doi: 10.1159/000237377.
The rates of sensitization and allergy to four birch pollen related plant foods were investigated in a group of 167 patients who were sensitive to at least one kind of pollen and one particular food. Sensitivity was concluded from a positive skin prick test or the determination of specific IgE, whereas allergy was based on anamnestic data. The positivity rates for sensitization and allergy, respectively, were: apple, 93 and 84%; hazelnut, 90 and 78%; celery, 70 and 14%; carrot, 60 and 37%. Comparative testing by skin prick test and enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) with extract from native and microwaved (750 W, 30 min, 100 degrees C) celery root was performed on 46 of these patients. At least one positive test result (either prick test or EAST) was obtained for native celery in 36/46 (78%) and for heated celery in 20/46 (43%) of these patients. Although the concordance between the EAST and the skin test was very low, extended control experiments of both test procedures revealed no evidence for nonspecificity. Immunoblot analyses of extract from native celery and sera of 60 patients with a positive EAST (class > or = 2, > or = 0.7 U/ml) for celery resulted in the following rates of IgE binding to known cross-reactive celery allergens: Api g 1:33%, celery profilin: 17%; multiple bands most probably due to carbohydrate epitopes: 32%. The rate of binding to other allergens was below 10%. Since these three important structures are also present in birch pollen, no allergen could be identified as a candidate to mediate an exclusive celery/mugwort association. Investigation of extract from native and heated celery by immunoblotting pointed to a high lability of Api g 1, whereas profilin and carbohydrate epitopes appeared to be more resistant to heat. It has been concluded that sensitization to celery in German patients is without clinical significance in the majority of cases, in contrast to other birch-pollen-related plant foods such as apple and hazelnut. For the particular kind of extract used, neither the EAST nor the skin test alone represents an appropriate diagnostic method for testing sensitization to celery.
在一组对至少一种花粉和一种特定食物敏感的167例患者中,研究了对四种桦树花粉相关植物性食物的致敏率和过敏率。致敏情况通过阳性皮肤点刺试验或特异性IgE测定得出,而过敏则基于既往病史数据。致敏和过敏的阳性率分别为:苹果,93%和84%;榛子,90%和78%;芹菜,70%和14%;胡萝卜,60%和37%。对其中46例患者进行了皮肤点刺试验和酶联免疫吸附试验(EAST),采用天然芹菜根提取物和经微波处理(750瓦,30分钟,100摄氏度)的芹菜根提取物进行比较检测。在这些患者中,36/46(78%)的患者天然芹菜至少有一项阳性检测结果(点刺试验或EAST),20/46(43%)的患者加热芹菜有阳性检测结果。虽然EAST和皮肤试验之间的一致性很低,但两种检测方法的扩展对照实验均未发现非特异性证据。对60例EAST阳性(分级≥2,≥0.7 U/ml)的芹菜患者的天然芹菜提取物和血清进行免疫印迹分析,结果显示IgE与已知交叉反应性芹菜过敏原的结合率如下:Api g 1:33%;芹菜肌动蛋白结合蛋白:17%;多条带很可能归因于碳水化合物表位:32%。与其他过敏原的结合率低于10%。由于这三种重要结构也存在于桦树花粉中,因此无法确定哪种过敏原是介导芹菜/艾蒿特异性关联的候选物。对天然芹菜和加热芹菜提取物进行免疫印迹分析表明,Api g 1的热稳定性很差,而肌动蛋白结合蛋白和碳水化合物表位似乎对热更具抗性。得出的结论是,与苹果和榛子等其他桦树花粉相关植物性食物相比,德国患者对芹菜的致敏在大多数情况下无临床意义。对于所使用的特定提取物类型,单独的EAST或皮肤试验都不是检测对芹菜致敏的合适诊断方法。