• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于慢性疼痛中催眠易感性与消极情绪的相互作用。对创伤躯体化的启示。

On the interaction of hypnotizability and negative affect in chronic pain. Implications for the somatization of trauma.

作者信息

Wickramasekera I, Pope A T, Kolm P

机构信息

Saybrook Institute, California, USA.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Oct;184(10):628-35. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199610000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-199610000-00008
PMID:8917161
Abstract

The high risk model of threat perception predicts that high hypnotizability is a risk factor for trauma-related somatization. It is hypothesized that high hypnotizability can increase experimentally induced threat or negative affect, as measured by skin conductance level, in a linear or dose-response manner. This hypothesized interaction of hypnotic ability and negative affect was found in a consecutive series of 118 adult patients with chronic pain symptoms. Larger increases in skin conductance levels during cognitive threat were significantly related to higher levels of hypnotizability. In addition, individuals with high hypnotizability retained higher skin conductance levels than individuals with low hypnotizability after stress. The clinical implications of the interaction of hypnotizability and negative affect during threat perception and delayed recovery from threat perception are discussed in terms of cognitive mechanisms in the etiology and therapy of trauma-related dissociative disorders.

摘要

威胁感知的高风险模型预测,高催眠易感性是创伤相关躯体化的一个风险因素。据推测,高催眠易感性会以线性或剂量反应方式增加通过皮肤电导率水平测量的实验诱导威胁或负面影响。在连续的118例有慢性疼痛症状的成年患者中发现了这种假设的催眠能力与负面影响的相互作用。认知威胁期间皮肤电导率水平的更大增加与更高水平的催眠易感性显著相关。此外,高催眠易感性个体在应激后比低催眠易感性个体保持更高的皮肤电导率水平。从创伤相关分离性障碍的病因学和治疗中的认知机制方面讨论了威胁感知期间催眠易感性与负面影响的相互作用以及从威胁感知中延迟恢复的临床意义。

相似文献

1
On the interaction of hypnotizability and negative affect in chronic pain. Implications for the somatization of trauma.关于慢性疼痛中催眠易感性与消极情绪的相互作用。对创伤躯体化的启示。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Oct;184(10):628-35. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199610000-00008.
2
Hypnotizability and traumatic experience: a diathesis-stress model of dissociative symptomatology.催眠易感性与创伤经历:分离症状学的素质-应激模型
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;153(7 Suppl):42-63. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.8.A42.
3
Is high hypnotizability a necessary diathesis for pathological dissociation?高催眠易感性是病理性分离的必要素质吗?
J Trauma Dissociation. 2017 Jan-Feb;18(1):58-87. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2016.1191579. Epub 2016 May 23.
4
Hypnotizability, pain threshold, and dissociative experiences.催眠易感性、疼痛阈值和分离体验。
Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Jul 1;44(1):69-71. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00511-8.
5
The Associations Between Pain-related Beliefs, Pain Intensity, and Patient Functioning: Hypnotizability as a Moderator.疼痛相关信念、疼痛强度与患者功能之间的关联:可催眠性作为调节因素
Clin J Pain. 2016 Jun;32(6):506-12. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000294.
6
Construct validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: II. Its relationship to hypnotizability.解离体验量表的结构效度:II. 其与催眠易感性的关系。
Am J Clin Hypn. 1992 Oct;35(2):145-52. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1992.10402997.
7
Hypnotizability in acute stress disorder.急性应激障碍中的催眠易感性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;158(4):600-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.600.
8
Hypnotizability and opinions about hypnosis in a clinical trial for the hypnotic control of pain and anxiety during pregnancy termination.催眠易感性和对催眠的看法在一项临床试验中,用于控制妊娠终止期间的疼痛和焦虑的催眠。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2010 Jan;58(1):82-101. doi: 10.1080/00207140903310865.
9
Hypnotizability as a potential risk factor for posttraumatic stress: a review of quantitative studies.作为创伤后应激潜在风险因素的催眠易感性:定量研究综述
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Jul;56(3):334-56. doi: 10.1080/00207140802042007.
10
Reconsidering the autohypnotic model of the dissociative disorders.重新思考分离性障碍的自动催眠模型。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2019 Jan-Feb;20(1):48-78. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2018.1451806. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The High-Risk Model of Threat Perception Modulates Learning of Placebo and Nocebo Effects and Functional Somatic Disorders.威胁感知的高风险模型调节安慰剂和反安慰剂效应以及功能性躯体障碍的学习。
Brain Sci. 2025 Sep 2;15(9):955. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15090955.
2
Postural effects of imagined leg pain as a function of hypnotizability.姿势对想象中腿部疼痛的影响与催眠易感性有关。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(3):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2935-1. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
3
Absorption: an individual difference to consider in mind-body interventions.
吸收:身心干预中需要考虑的个体差异。
J Holist Nurs. 2008 Dec;26(4):297-302. doi: 10.1177/0898010107307456.