• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The challenge of contracting for technological information.技术信息的合同签订挑战。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12743-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12743.
2
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
3
New ways of insulin delivery.胰岛素递送的新方法。
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb(170):31-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02577.x.
4
Beware the Medical-Industrial Complex.警惕医疗产业联合体。
Oncologist. 1996;1(4):IV-V.
5
Patenting nanotechnology.纳米技术专利申请。
Stanford Law Rev. 2005 Nov;58(2):601-30.
6
Changing the way employee benefit communications are produced: outsourcing, a more efficient, less costly process.
Empl Benefits J. 1995 Dec;20(4):35-7.
7
Context matters in NGO-government contracting for health service delivery: a case study from Pakistan.背景因素对非政府组织与政府间卫生服务提供合同的影响:来自巴基斯坦的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):570-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr081. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
8
Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology.产业创新与技术扩散。
Science. 1974 Feb 15;183(4125):620-6. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4125.620.
9
New ways of insulin delivery.胰岛素递送的新方法。
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010 Feb(166):29-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02276.x.
10
Institutional obstacles to expansion of world food production.世界粮食生产扩张的制度性障碍。
Science. 1975 May 9;188(4188):519-24. doi: 10.1126/science.188.4188.519.

引用本文的文献

1
Science, technology, and economic growth.科学、技术与经济增长。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12655-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12655.

本文引用的文献

1
University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university.生物技术领域的产学研合作关系:对大学的影响
Science. 1986 Jun 13;232(4756):1361-6. doi: 10.1126/science.3715452.

技术信息的合同签订挑战。

The challenge of contracting for technological information.

作者信息

Zeckhauser R

机构信息

John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12743-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12743.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12743
PMID:8917488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC34131/
Abstract

Contracting to provide technological information (TI) is a significant challenge. TI is an unusual commodity in five ways. (i) TI is difficult to count and value; conventional indicators, such as patients and citations, hardly indicate value. TI is often sold at different prices to different parties. (ii) To value TI, it may be necessary to "give away the secret." This danger, despite nondisclosure agreements, inhibits efforts to market TI. (iii) To prove its value, TI is often bundled into complete products, such as a computer chip or pharmaceutical product. Efficient exchange, by contrast, would involve merely the raw information. (iv) Sellers' superior knowledge about TI's value make buyers wary of overpaying. (v) Inefficient contracts are often designed to secure rents from TI. For example, licensing agreements charge more than marginal cost. These contracting difficulties affect the way TI is produced, encouraging self-reliance. This should be an advantage to large firms. However, small research and development firms spend more per employee than large firms, and nonprofit universities are major producers. Networks of organizational relationships, particularly between universities and industry, are critical in transmitting TI. Implicit barter-money for guidance-is common. Property rights for TI are hard to establish. Patents, quite suitable for better mousetraps, are inadequate for an era when we design better mice. Much TI is not patented, and what is patented sets fuzzy demarcations. New organizational forms are a promising approach to contracting difficulties for TI. Webs of relationships, formal and informal, involving universities, start-up firms, corporate giants, and venture capitalists play a major role in facilitating the production and spread of TI.

摘要

签订提供技术信息(TI)的合同是一项重大挑战。TI 在五个方面是一种特殊商品。(i)TI 难以计数和估值;诸如患者数量和引用次数等传统指标几乎无法体现其价值。TI 常常以不同价格卖给不同的各方。(ii)为了评估 TI 的价值,可能有必要“泄露秘密”。尽管有保密协议,这种风险仍抑制了 TI 的市场推广努力。(iii)为了证明其价值,TI 通常被整合到完整产品中,如计算机芯片或药品。相比之下,高效的交换仅涉及原始信息。(iv)卖方对 TI 价值的更优了解使买方担心支付过高费用。(v)低效合同往往旨在从 TI 中获取租金。例如,许可协议收取的费用高于边际成本。这些合同难题影响了 TI 的生产方式,促使企业自力更生。这本应是大公司的优势。然而,小型研发公司人均花费高于大公司,非营利性大学也是主要生产者。组织关系网络,尤其是大学与产业之间的网络,在 TI 的传播中至关重要。隐性易货——用指导换取资金——很常见。TI 的产权难以确立。专利对于更好的捕鼠器很合适,但在我们设计更好的老鼠的时代却不够用。许多 TI 未获专利,已获专利的也划定了模糊的界限。新的组织形式是解决 TI 合同难题的一种有前景的方法。涉及大学、初创公司、企业巨头和风险投资家的正式和非正式关系网络在促进 TI 的生产和传播中发挥着重要作用。