Zeckhauser R
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12743-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12743.
Contracting to provide technological information (TI) is a significant challenge. TI is an unusual commodity in five ways. (i) TI is difficult to count and value; conventional indicators, such as patients and citations, hardly indicate value. TI is often sold at different prices to different parties. (ii) To value TI, it may be necessary to "give away the secret." This danger, despite nondisclosure agreements, inhibits efforts to market TI. (iii) To prove its value, TI is often bundled into complete products, such as a computer chip or pharmaceutical product. Efficient exchange, by contrast, would involve merely the raw information. (iv) Sellers' superior knowledge about TI's value make buyers wary of overpaying. (v) Inefficient contracts are often designed to secure rents from TI. For example, licensing agreements charge more than marginal cost. These contracting difficulties affect the way TI is produced, encouraging self-reliance. This should be an advantage to large firms. However, small research and development firms spend more per employee than large firms, and nonprofit universities are major producers. Networks of organizational relationships, particularly between universities and industry, are critical in transmitting TI. Implicit barter-money for guidance-is common. Property rights for TI are hard to establish. Patents, quite suitable for better mousetraps, are inadequate for an era when we design better mice. Much TI is not patented, and what is patented sets fuzzy demarcations. New organizational forms are a promising approach to contracting difficulties for TI. Webs of relationships, formal and informal, involving universities, start-up firms, corporate giants, and venture capitalists play a major role in facilitating the production and spread of TI.
签订提供技术信息(TI)的合同是一项重大挑战。TI 在五个方面是一种特殊商品。(i)TI 难以计数和估值;诸如患者数量和引用次数等传统指标几乎无法体现其价值。TI 常常以不同价格卖给不同的各方。(ii)为了评估 TI 的价值,可能有必要“泄露秘密”。尽管有保密协议,这种风险仍抑制了 TI 的市场推广努力。(iii)为了证明其价值,TI 通常被整合到完整产品中,如计算机芯片或药品。相比之下,高效的交换仅涉及原始信息。(iv)卖方对 TI 价值的更优了解使买方担心支付过高费用。(v)低效合同往往旨在从 TI 中获取租金。例如,许可协议收取的费用高于边际成本。这些合同难题影响了 TI 的生产方式,促使企业自力更生。这本应是大公司的优势。然而,小型研发公司人均花费高于大公司,非营利性大学也是主要生产者。组织关系网络,尤其是大学与产业之间的网络,在 TI 的传播中至关重要。隐性易货——用指导换取资金——很常见。TI 的产权难以确立。专利对于更好的捕鼠器很合适,但在我们设计更好的老鼠的时代却不够用。许多 TI 未获专利,已获专利的也划定了模糊的界限。新的组织形式是解决 TI 合同难题的一种有前景的方法。涉及大学、初创公司、企业巨头和风险投资家的正式和非正式关系网络在促进 TI 的生产和传播中发挥着重要作用。