Suppr超能文献

县级社会经济因素与个体烟酒使用的关联:对美国成年人的纵向研究。

The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, 995 Potrero Avenue, Building 80, Ward 83, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.

Environmental Health Sciences Division, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6700-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Place-based factors have been implicated as root causes of socioeconomic disparities in risky health behaviors such as tobacco and alcohol use. Yet few studies examine the effects of county-level socioeconomic characteristics, despite the fact that social and public health policies are often implemented at the county level. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that county-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with individual tobacco and alcohol use.

METHODS

The sample included a panel of participants from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (N = 9302). The primary predictors were three time-varying measures of socioeconomic disadvantage in an individual's county of residence: educational attainment, percent unemployment, and per capita income. We first conducted traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) models, both unadjusted and adjusted for individual-level covariates. We then conducted fixed effects (FE) models to adjust for confounding by unmeasured time-invariant individual-level factors.

RESULTS

OLS and FE models yielded contrasting results: higher county-level per capita income was associated with decreased drinking in OLS models and increased drinking in FE models, while decreased county-level educational attainment was associated with decreased smoking in OLS models and more cigarettes per day in FE models. The findings from FE models suggest that OLS models were confounded by unobserved time-invariant characteristics. Notably, the point estimates for the county-level measures were small, and in many cases they may not represent a clinically meaningful effect except at the population level.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that county-level socioeconomic characteristics may modestly influence tobacco and alcohol use. Future work should examine the effects of specific county policies that might explain these findings.

摘要

背景

地方因素被认为是导致社会经济差异的根本原因,这些差异表现在吸烟和饮酒等危险健康行为上。然而,很少有研究检验县级社会经济特征的影响,尽管社会和公共卫生政策通常在县级实施。在这项研究中,我们检验了县级社会经济劣势与个体烟草和酒精使用有关的假设。

方法

该样本包括来自全国青年纵向调查(N=9302)的参与者的一个面板。主要预测因素是个体居住县的三种随时间变化的社会经济劣势衡量标准:教育程度、失业率和人均收入。我们首先进行了传统的普通最小二乘法(OLS)模型,包括未调整和调整个体水平协变量的模型。然后,我们进行了固定效应(FE)模型,以调整未测量的个体水平不变因素造成的混杂。

结果

OLS 和 FE 模型得出了相互矛盾的结果:较高的县级人均收入与 OLS 模型中的饮酒减少和 FE 模型中的饮酒增加有关,而较低的县级教育程度与 OLS 模型中的吸烟减少和 FE 模型中的每天吸烟量增加有关。FE 模型的结果表明,OLS 模型受到未观察到的个体水平不变特征的混杂影响。值得注意的是,县级措施的点估计值较小,在许多情况下,除了在人群水平上,它们可能不会代表有临床意义的影响。

结论

这些结果表明,县级社会经济特征可能适度影响烟草和酒精使用。未来的工作应该研究可能解释这些发现的特定县级政策的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/6458796/9087183ab37d/12889_2019_6700_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验