Suppr超能文献

作为儿科心理学中一个过程的评估

Assessment as a process in pediatric psychology.

作者信息

La Greca A M, Lemanek K L

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Apr;21(2):137-51. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/21.2.137.

Abstract

In this editorial, we have highlighted several key aspects of the assessment process. First, we consider it critical that pediatric psychologists view "assessment as a process," and not as a test or measure. Assessment begins with the formulation of a precise, answerable question--and this maxim is equally important for researchers and clinicians. It is especially critical that research questions be conceptually based, as well as of applied interest. The development of an appropriate assessment strategy should always follow directly from the question that is posed. Second, in developing an assessment strategy, we advocate selecting the "best" informants and the "best" measurement methods available, also taking into consideration the developmental level of the participants and the types of constructs being assessed. In most cases, it will be desirable to use multiple informants, rather than relying on a single source. Given the measurement constraints discussed earlier, we also advocate using multiple measures to assess a construct, and avoiding single-item measures. We also feel strongly that pediatric psychologists should consider designing focused studies of developmentally appropriate age groups, rather than evaluating children from a very broad age range (e.g., infants to teens). Third, as pediatric psychological research moves into new areas of inquiry, assessment should represent a "growth area." We need psychometrically sound measures that are appropriate for use with pediatric health populations. We also need to develop assessment strategies that capture the rich and complex process of dealing with health and disease and, therefore, we should consider gathering qualitative data, to supplement standardized questionnaires. Finally, we recognize that pediatric psychologists face many practical constraints and challenges in the assessment process, especially in today's volatile health care climate. We have seen and will continue to see radical changes in the way health care is provided; pediatric psychologists and other care providers are continually making adjustments in their activities to respond to these frequent shifts and changes. In part because of these changes, pediatric psychologists need to develop and use methods to assess the financial costs and benefits of their interventions. With the increasing emphasis on providing quality medical care at the lowest possible price, efforts to document the valuable contributions of pediatric psychologists become paramount. By sharing our ideas and strategies, as many of the contributors to this issue have done, we stand a better chance of making a better future.

摘要

在这篇社论中,我们着重强调了评估过程的几个关键方面。首先,我们认为儿科心理学家将“评估视为一个过程”至关重要,而不是将其视为一项测试或测量。评估始于提出一个精确、可回答的问题——这一准则对研究人员和临床医生同样重要。尤其关键的是,研究问题应基于概念,同时具有应用价值。合适的评估策略的制定应始终直接源于所提出的问题。其次,在制定评估策略时,我们主张选择现有的“最佳”信息提供者和“最佳”测量方法,同时也要考虑参与者的发育水平以及所评估的构念类型。在大多数情况下,使用多个信息提供者比依赖单一来源更为可取。鉴于前面讨论的测量限制,我们还主张使用多种测量方法来评估一个构念,并避免使用单项测量方法。我们也强烈认为,儿科心理学家应考虑针对发育适宜的年龄组设计重点研究,而不是对年龄范围非常宽泛的儿童(如婴儿到青少年)进行评估。第三,随着儿科心理学研究进入新的探究领域,评估应成为一个“增长领域”。我们需要在心理测量学上可靠、适用于儿科健康人群的测量方法。我们还需要制定评估策略,以捕捉应对健康和疾病的丰富复杂过程,因此,我们应考虑收集定性数据,以补充标准化问卷。最后,我们认识到儿科心理学家在评估过程中面临许多实际限制和挑战,尤其是在当今动荡的医疗环境中。我们已经看到并将继续看到医疗保健提供方式的巨大变化;儿科心理学家和其他护理提供者不断调整他们的活动,以应对这些频繁的变化。部分由于这些变化,儿科心理学家需要开发并使用方法来评估他们干预措施的经济成本和效益。随着越来越强调以尽可能低的价格提供高质量医疗服务,记录儿科心理学家的宝贵贡献的努力变得至关重要。通过像本期许多撰稿人那样分享我们的想法和策略,我们更有可能创造一个更美好的未来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验