LeSage M G, Byrne T, Poling A
Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo 49008, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Nov;66(3):349-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-349.
The present study examined in 8-hour sessions the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding in rats that were exposed to procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 8, or 16 seconds relative to the response that produced it. Both nonresetting- and resetting-delay conditions were studied. Although neither shaping nor autoshaping occurred, substantial levels of operative-lever responding developed under all conditions in which responses produced water. The lowest dose (1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine either had no effect on or increased operative-lever pressing, whereas higher doses typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing. Nonetheless, overall rates of operative-lever pressing at these doses were as high as, or higher than, those observed with vehicle. Thus, response acquisition was observed under all reinforcement procedures at all drug doses. In the absence of the drug, most responding occurred on the operative lever when reinforcement was immediate. Such differential responding also developed under both nonresetting- and resetting-delay procedures when the delay was 8 seconds, but not when it was 16 seconds. d-Amphetamine did not affect the development of differential responding under any procedure. Thus, consistent with d-amphetamine's effects under repeated acquisition procedures, the drug had no detrimental effect on learning until doses that produced general behavioral disruption were administered.
本研究以8小时为时间段,考察了右旋苯丙胺(1.0、5.6和10毫克/千克)对大鼠获得杠杆按压反应的影响,这些大鼠所接受的实验程序中,水的供应相对于产生水的反应延迟了0、8或16秒。研究了非重置延迟和重置延迟两种条件。尽管既未出现塑造行为也未出现自动塑造行为,但在所有反应能产生水的条件下,操作性杠杆反应都达到了相当高的水平。最低剂量(1.0毫克/千克)的右旋苯丙胺对操作性杠杆按压要么没有影响,要么使其增加,而较高剂量通常会使杠杆按压最初减少。尽管如此,这些剂量下的操作性杠杆按压总体速率与给予赋形剂时观察到的速率一样高,或更高。因此,在所有药物剂量的所有强化程序下都观察到了反应习得。在无药物的情况下,当强化是即时的时,大多数反应发生在操作性杠杆上。当延迟为8秒时,在非重置延迟和重置延迟程序下也出现了这种差异反应,但延迟为16秒时则未出现。在任何程序下,右旋苯丙胺都不影响差异反应的发展。因此,与右旋苯丙胺在重复习得程序下的作用一致,在给予产生一般行为扰乱的剂量之前,该药物对学习没有有害影响。