• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放弃维持生命治疗的决定及记录的责任。

Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment and the duty of documentation.

作者信息

Melltorp G, Nilstun T

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1015-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01699221.

DOI:10.1007/BF01699221
PMID:8923063
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the current practice of documenting decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), using the Swedish Medical Records Act as a frame of reference.

SETTING

The ICU at Malmoe General Hospital, Sweden.

MATERIALS

The medical records of the first 600 cases treated in the ICU in 1992.

METHODS

Analysis of documents and informal observational procedures.

RESULTS

Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment were documented in the medical records of 34 patients, 17 of whom died in the ICU. In many cases, the treatment is specified, but often it is only rather vaguely described. The main reason for foregoing treatment is poor prognosis. There is no indication that the decisions had been discussed with the patients. In 18 of the 34 medical records, there are notes indicating that relatives were informed about the decision. Notes in most of the 34 medical records imply that joint deliberation took place between the anaesthesiologists in the ICU and the other physician(s) responsible for the treatment of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The medical records give a fairly accurate picture of the frequency with which such decisions are made at this particular ICU, although the number might be somewhat underestimated. However, the content of the documentation is rather scanty and does not fully satisfy the requirements of the Swedish Medical Records Act. Further studies are needed to warrant any generalization.

摘要

目的

以瑞典医疗记录法为参照标准,研究重症监护病房(ICU)中记录放弃生命维持治疗决策的当前做法。

地点

瑞典马尔默综合医院的ICU。

材料

1992年在该ICU接受治疗的前600例病例的医疗记录。

方法

对文件进行分析并采用非正式观察程序。

结果

34例患者的医疗记录中有放弃生命维持治疗的决策记录,其中17例在ICU死亡。在许多情况下,治疗措施有明确规定,但通常描述得相当模糊。放弃治疗的主要原因是预后不良。没有迹象表明这些决策已与患者进行过讨论。在34份医疗记录中的18份里,有记录表明已将决策告知亲属。34份医疗记录中的大多数记录暗示,ICU的麻醉医生与负责该患者治疗的其他医生进行了共同商讨。

结论

医疗记录对该特定ICU做出此类决策的频率给出了较为准确的描述,尽管实际数量可能略有低估。然而,记录内容相当简略,不完全符合瑞典医疗记录法的要求。需要进一步研究以确保能进行任何概括总结。

相似文献

1
Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment and the duty of documentation.放弃维持生命治疗的决定及记录的责任。
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1015-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01699221.
2
Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in a Norwegian intensive care unit.挪威重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销维持生命治疗的决策
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):329-36. doi: 10.1111/aas.12246. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
Patient-related factors and circumstances surrounding decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment, including intensive care unit admission refusal.与患者相关的因素以及围绕放弃维持生命治疗的决定的情况,包括拒绝入住重症监护病房。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2076-83. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c0ea7.
4
Do-not-resuscitate and treatment limitation decisions - Six years of experience from a Portuguese General Intensive Care Unit.不进行心肺复苏和治疗限制决策——来自葡萄牙一家综合重症监护病房的六年经验
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Oct 10;65(9):1168-1173. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.9.1168. eCollection 2019.
5
A nationwide study of decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment in Dutch medical practice.一项关于荷兰医疗实践中放弃延长生命治疗决策的全国性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):357-63. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.3.357.
6
The impact of healthcare professionals' personality and religious beliefs on the decisions to forego life sustaining treatments: an observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study in Greek intensive care units.医疗保健专业人员的个性和宗教信仰对放弃维持生命治疗决策的影响:希腊重症监护病房的一项观察性、多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):e013916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013916.
7
Admission to intensive care unit at the end-of-life: is it an informed decision?临终时入住重症监护病房:这是一个明智的决定吗?
Palliat Med. 2004 Dec;18(8):705-11. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm959oa.
8
Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a Lebanese intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.黎巴嫩重症监护病房生命维持治疗的 withhold 与撤除:一项前瞻性观察研究 。(注:“withhold”在这里准确意思需结合医学语境进一步理解,大致有“ withhold treatment”有“停止给予治疗”之意 ,整体翻译可能因专业知识背景不同而稍作调整,但按要求先直译如此)
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Apr;31(4):562-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2578-4. Epub 2005 Mar 5.
9
Limiting life support. Experiences with a special protocol.限制生命支持。一项特殊协议的经验
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Feb;42(2):232-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05115.x.
10
Documentation on withdrawal of life support in adult patients in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房成年患者生命支持撤除的相关记录。
Am J Crit Care. 2004 Jul;13(4):328-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptom Management and Supportive Care of Serious COVID-19 Patients and their Families in India.印度重症新冠肺炎患者及其家属的症状管理与支持性护理
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;24(6):435-444. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23400.
2
The impact of healthcare professionals' personality and religious beliefs on the decisions to forego life sustaining treatments: an observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study in Greek intensive care units.医疗保健专业人员的个性和宗教信仰对放弃维持生命治疗决策的影响:希腊重症监护病房的一项观察性、多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):e013916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013916.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Appleton International Conference: Developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life-prolonging medical treatment -- Preamble, Parts I, II, III, and IV.阿普尔顿国际会议:制定放弃延长生命医疗治疗决策的指南——前言,第一、二、三及四部分
J Med Ethics. 1992 Sep;18(Suppl):S3-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.suppl.3.
2
Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit.美国重症监护病房临终决策的趋势。
Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(6):316-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01694704.
3
Epidemiology of no-code orders in an academic hospital.
Ethics and medico legal aspects of "not for resuscitation".
“不予复苏”的伦理和法医学问题
Indian J Palliat Care. 2010 May;16(2):66-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.68404.
4
Clinical audit on documentation of anticipatory "not for resuscitation" orders in a tertiary Australian teaching hospital.澳大利亚一家三级教学医院中关于预立“不进行心肺复苏”医嘱记录的临床审计。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):42-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.78448.
5
Family members' experiences of "wait and see" as a communication strategy in end-of-life decisions.家庭成员对“观望”作为临终决策沟通策略的体验。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2253-x. Epub 2011 May 28.
6
Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.欧洲重症监护病房临终决策的原因、考量因素、困难及记录:伦理研究
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0927-1. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
7
Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.欧洲重症监护病房中临终决策的沟通。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Sep;31(9):1215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2742-x. Epub 2005 Jul 22.
8
Worldwide similarities and differences in the foregoing of life-sustaining treatments.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1003-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01699218.
一所学术医院中无代码医嘱的流行病学
West J Med. 1984 Jan;140(1):114-6.
4
Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a community hospital. Incidence, implications, and outcomes.社区医院中的不复苏决定。发生率、影响及结果。
JAMA. 1986 Sep 5;256(9):1164-9.
5
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?护理质量。如何对其进行评估?
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.
6
Do-not-resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wards.瑞典医疗病房中的“不要复苏”医嘱。
J Intern Med. 1990 Aug;228(2):139-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1990.tb00207.x.
7
European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire.欧洲对重症监护医学伦理问题的态度:一份伦理调查问卷的结果
Intensive Care Med. 1990;16(4):256-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01705162.
8
Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.对重症患者生命支持的撤除与 withholding(此处 withholding 可意译为“不予提供”)
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 1;322(5):309-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199002013220506.
9
Ethical principles in critical care.重症监护中的伦理原则。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):696-700.
10
[Terminal intensive care--ethical viewpoints].
Lakartidningen. 1991 Jun 26;88(26-27):2368, 2370.