Aaron D K
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1996 Nov;74(11):2810-27. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112810x.
Founded on the premise that "learning to write" and "writing to learn" are parallel processes, Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) programs advocate the use of writing activities to enhance learning in subject matter courses across the university curriculum. Application of WAC theory to creating assignments and evaluating writing in undergraduate animal science courses is the primary focus of this paper. Although a variety of writing-to-learn activities are promoted by WAC programs, this discussion is confined to reader-based, applied or real-world assignments completed by students outside the classroom. Writing assignments of this type are effective learning tools because they guide students toward appropriate information, language, and organization, present writing as communication, not artifact, and allow students to see how classroom study of concepts can be applied to the real world. Additionally, they provide opportunity for feedback during the writing process. Although considerable effort is required to create such writing assignments and to design evaluation and grading strategies that will provide constructive feedback, animal science teachers have a responsibility to provide students with expanded opportunities for improving critical thinking and communication skills. Sharing writing assignments, like the ones included in this paper, is one way to accomplish these objectives while minimizing aggregate faculty effort.
基于“学习写作”和“通过写作学习”是并行过程这一前提,跨课程写作(WAC)项目提倡通过写作活动来促进大学课程中各学科课程的学习。将WAC理论应用于本科动物科学课程的作业设计和写作评估是本文的主要关注点。虽然WAC项目提倡各种各样的通过写作学习的活动,但本文的讨论仅限于学生在课堂外完成的基于读者、应用型或现实世界的作业。这类写作作业是有效的学习工具,因为它们引导学生获取恰当的信息、语言和组织方式,将写作视为交流而非作品,并让学生明白课堂上对概念的学习如何应用于现实世界。此外,它们还为写作过程中的反馈提供了机会。虽然设计此类写作作业以及设计能提供建设性反馈的评估和评分策略需要付出巨大努力,但动物科学教师有责任为学生提供更多机会,以提高他们的批判性思维和沟通能力。分享像本文中包含的写作作业,是实现这些目标同时将教师的总体工作量降至最低的一种方式。