Suppr超能文献

美国外科医师学会创伤分诊标准在郊区和农村环境中的评估。

Evaluation of American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria in a suburban and rural setting.

作者信息

Henry M C, Alicandro J M, Hollander J E, Moldashel J G, Cassara G, Thode H C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-7400, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;14(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90117-5.

Abstract

In suburban and rural counties, patient transport to specialized facilities such as trauma centers may result in prolonged transport times with the resultant loss of ambulance coverage in the primary service area. We evaluated the American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria as modified by New York State to determine the ability of these criteria to predict the need for trauma center care in victims of blunt traumatic injury. Blunt trauma patients were retrospectively identified through review of patient care reports for the presence either of mechanism or of physiological criteria for transport to a trauma center. Controls were randomly selected from patients with blunt trauma not meeting any of the criteria. Main outcome parameters were the emergency department (ED) disposition, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care unit (ICU) care, and major nonorthopedic operative interventions. There were 857 patients enrolled. The presence either of mechanism or of physiological criteria increased the likelihood of hospital admission (control, 11%; mechanism, 35%; and physiological, 33%). Relative to patients without any criteria, the presence of mechanism criteria alone did not identify patients who required a prolonged length of stay (67% vs 71%), intensive care unit services (13% vs 19%) or major nonorthopedic operative interventions (0.2% vs 1.6%). The presence of physiological criteria increased the likelihood of requiring all of these services. These comparisons held true for victims of motor vehicle accidents, pedestrians struck by motor vehicles, and people who fell from heights above ground level. Patients with physiologic criteria may benefit from transport directly to a trauma center. Because of the low need for operative intervention and ICU services, patients with no criteria or mechanism criteria at long distances from a trauma center may be initially evaluated at the closest hospital and transferred to a trauma center if hospitalization or ICU care is necessary. Further study to determine the predictive value of certain individual mechanism criteria is warranted.

摘要

在郊区和农村县,将患者转运至创伤中心等专科机构可能会导致转运时间延长,进而导致主要服务区域内救护车覆盖范围缺失。我们评估了经纽约州修改的美国外科医师学会创伤分诊标准,以确定这些标准预测钝性创伤受害者对创伤中心护理需求的能力。通过审查患者护理报告,回顾性确定钝性创伤患者是否存在转运至创伤中心的机制或生理标准。对照组从不符合任何标准的钝性创伤患者中随机选取。主要结局参数包括急诊科处置、住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)护理需求以及非骨科主要手术干预。共纳入857例患者。存在机制或生理标准会增加住院可能性(对照组为11%;机制组为35%;生理组为33%)。与无任何标准的患者相比,仅存在机制标准并不能识别出需要延长住院时间(分别为67%和71%)、重症监护病房服务(分别为13%和19%)或非骨科主要手术干预(分别为0.2%和1.6%)的患者。存在生理标准会增加对所有这些服务的需求可能性。这些比较在机动车事故受害者、被机动车撞击的行人以及从地面以上高处坠落的人群中均成立。符合生理标准的患者可能直接转运至创伤中心会受益。由于手术干预和ICU服务需求较低,距离创伤中心较远且无标准或机制标准的患者可先在最近的医院进行评估,如有必要住院或接受ICU护理则转至创伤中心。有必要进一步研究以确定某些个体机制标准的预测价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验