Suppr超能文献

因“致伤机制”而启动创伤团队救治钝性创伤患者:是时候做出改变了吗?

Trauma team activation for 'mechanism of injury' blunt trauma victims: time for a change?

作者信息

Shatney C H, Sensaki K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1994 Aug;37(2):275-81; discussion 281-2.

PMID:8064929
Abstract

Excessive overtriage prompted a review of all stable blunt trauma victims < or = age 65 years transported to our trauma center from 1990 through 1992 only by virtue of mechanism of injury. Of 4392 blunt trauma patients, 2298 (52%) met review criteria. In this group 1712 (75%) were discharged home from the emergency room, and 586 were hospitalized: 367 (63%) for < or = 1 day; 465 (79%) for < or = 2 days. Of 93 ICU patients, 61 (66%) stayed < or = 24 hours, and 78 (84%) < or = 48 hours. Most ICU admissions were for neurologic or cardiac monitoring. The mean ISS of the population was < or = 2.8; only 15 patients had an ISS > or = 16. No patient required urgent transfer from the emergency room to the operating room for hemodynamic or neurologic instability. Four patients (0.17%) had early surgery following appropriate radiologic evaluation and underwent hemisplenectomy; brachial artery repair; ligation of a mesenteric bleeder; or evacuation of a subdural hematoma. Early open reduction/internal fixation of extremity fractures was done in 22 other patients (0.96%). Initial trauma team evaluation of hemodynamically stable blunt trauma victims whose only reason for trauma center transport is mechanism of injury is needlessly labor intensive and is not cost effective. Rather, a competent trauma center emergency medicine physician should be able to safely perform an initial assessment of such patients and summon the surgery team for specific clinical or radiologic indicators.

摘要

过度分诊促使我们对1990年至1992年间仅因受伤机制而被送往我们创伤中心的所有65岁及以下的稳定钝性创伤患者进行了回顾。在4392例钝性创伤患者中,2298例(52%)符合回顾标准。在这组患者中,1712例(75%)从急诊室出院回家,586例住院:367例(63%)住院时间≤1天;465例(79%)住院时间≤2天。在93例重症监护病房患者中,61例(66%)住院时间≤24小时,78例(84%)住院时间≤48小时。大多数重症监护病房的收治是为了进行神经或心脏监测。该人群的平均损伤严重度评分≤2.8;只有15例患者的损伤严重度评分≥16。没有患者因血流动力学或神经功能不稳定而需要从急诊室紧急转至手术室。4例患者(0.17%)在进行适当的影像学评估后接受了早期手术,分别进行了脾切除术;肱动脉修复术;肠系膜出血结扎术;或硬膜下血肿清除术。另外22例患者(0.96%)进行了早期四肢骨折切开复位/内固定术。对于仅因受伤机制而被送往创伤中心的血流动力学稳定的钝性创伤患者,创伤团队进行的初始评估不必要地耗费人力,且不具有成本效益。相反,一名合格的创伤中心急诊医学医生应该能够安全地对这类患者进行初步评估,并在出现特定临床或影像学指标时召集手术团队。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验