Ward A M, Pickering J D, Fagerhol M K, Martin J P
Hum Hered. 1977;27(4):292-7. doi: 10.1159/000152881.
The Pi typing methods acid starch-gel electrophoresis (ASGE) and isoelectric focusing (IEF) have been compared by three reference laboratories: 564 samples of phenotypes Pi M, MS and MZ were tested in each of the three laboratories with a 96% agreement on initial typing. The discrepancies are recorded and reasons for disagreement discussed. IEF is a reliable method for Pi typing and gives results comparable to those obtained by ASGE.
三个参考实验室对Pi分型方法酸性淀粉凝胶电泳(ASGE)和等电聚焦(IEF)进行了比较:三个实验室分别对564份Pi M、MS和MZ表型样本进行了检测,初始分型的一致性为96%。记录了差异并讨论了不一致的原因。IEF是一种可靠的Pi分型方法,其结果与ASGE获得的结果相当。