Suppr超能文献

一项比较吻合器吻合与手工缝合食管胃吻合术的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses.

作者信息

Craig S R, Walker W S, Cameron E W, Wightman A J

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, City Hospital, Edinburgh.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Feb;41(1):17-9.

PMID:8930036
Abstract

One hundred patients with carcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastric cardia undergoing oesophagogastrectomy were randomized to receive either a stapled or handsewn oesophagogastric anastomosis. Five patients died in the early post-operative period at a mean of 16 days (in-hospital mortality 5%) allowing detailed follow up on the remaining 95 patients who were followed up to death or for a minimum of 36 months. A stapled anastomosis was quicker to perform (P < 0.001), resulting in a shorter operative time (P < 0.005) and was associated with decreased blood loss (P < 0.05). The number of anastomotic leaks, length of in-patient stay, stricture formation and survival in the two groups was not statistically different. A stapled oesophagogastric anastomosis fulfills all of the requirements for routine use in thoracic surgical practice when performing oesophageal resection for carcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastric cardia. It is quick to perform allowing a shorter operating time and lower blood loss and does not appear to be associated with a previously noted increased incidence of benign anastomotic stricture formation when compared with handsewn anastomoses.

摘要

一百例行食管胃切除术的远端食管癌或贲门癌患者被随机分为两组,分别接受吻合器吻合或手工缝合的食管胃吻合术。5例患者在术后早期死亡,平均死亡时间为16天(住院死亡率5%),其余95例患者得到详细随访,随访至死亡或至少36个月。吻合器吻合术操作更快(P<0.001),手术时间更短(P<0.005),且失血量减少(P<0.05)。两组的吻合口漏发生率、住院时间、狭窄形成情况及生存率无统计学差异。在对远端食管癌或贲门癌行食管切除术时,吻合器食管胃吻合术满足胸外科常规使用的所有要求。它操作迅速,可缩短手术时间并减少失血量,与手工缝合吻合术相比,似乎不会增加良性吻合口狭窄形成的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验