Suppr超能文献

不同同步机械通气方法对早产儿通气、气体交换、患者用力及血压波动的影响

Influence of different methods of synchronized mechanical ventilation on ventilation, gas exchange, patient effort, and blood pressure fluctuations in premature neonates.

作者信息

Hummler H, Gerhardt T, Gonzalez A, Claure N, Everett R, Bancalari E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Florida 33101, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 Nov;22(5):305-13. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199611)22:5<305::AID-PPUL3>3.0.CO;2-J.

Abstract

We studied the effects of two methods of synchronized mechanical ventilation [synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and assist/control (A/C)] on ventilation, gas exchange, patient effort, and arterial blood pressure (ABP) fluctuations. SIMV and A/C were applied in random order in 12 preterm neonates (gestational age, 29.7 +/- 2.3 weeks; birth weight, 1,217 +/- 402 g). We measured total (Vetot) and mechanical (Vemech) minute ventilation, spontaneous (Vtspont) and ventilator supported (Vtmech) tidal volume, transcutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2), transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2), and PCO2, (TcPCO2), mean airway pressure (Paw), phasic esophageal pressure deflections (Pe) as an estimate of inspiratory effort, mean arterial blood pressure (ABP), and beat-to-beat ABP fluctuations. The measurements obtained during conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) were compared with the recordings during SIMV and A/C. To make the measurement conditions comparable and to prevent hyperventilation, peak inspiratory pressure was reduced during the A/C mode so that Vetot remained in the same range as during the IMV mode. Whereas Vetot was similar in all three conditions by study design, Vemech was larger during SIMV and A/C than during IMV. Vtmech increased during SIMV and by study design was smaller during A/C than during IMV. Pe decreased during SIMV and A/C compared with IMV, and Paw was higher during A/C than during IMV or SIMV. Beat-to-beat ABP fluctuations were reduced during SIMV and A/C compared with IMV and showed a close positive correlation with Pe changes. We conclude that SIMV increases Vemech and reduces Pe compared with IMV, resulting in smaller intrathoracic and ABP fluctuations. During A/C, a substantial portion of the spontaneous respiratory effort is shifted to the ventilator, resulting in a further decrease in Pe and ABP fluctuations.

摘要

我们研究了两种同步机械通气方法[同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)和辅助/控制通气(A/C)]对通气、气体交换、患者用力情况以及动脉血压(ABP)波动的影响。在12例早产儿(胎龄29.7±2.3周;出生体重1217±402克)中,以随机顺序应用SIMV和A/C。我们测量了总分钟通气量(Vetot)和机械分钟通气量(Vemech)、自主潮气量(Vtspont)和呼吸机支持潮气量(Vtmech)、经皮血氧饱和度(SpO2)、经皮氧分压(TcPO2)和二氧化碳分压(TcPCO2)、平均气道压(Paw)、作为吸气用力估计值的相位性食管压力偏转(Pe)、平均动脉血压(ABP)以及逐搏ABP波动。将传统间歇指令通气(IMV)期间获得的测量值与SIMV和A/C期间的记录进行比较。为使测量条件具有可比性并防止通气过度,在A/C模式下降低了吸气峰压,以使Vetot保持在与IMV模式相同的范围内。尽管根据研究设计在所有三种情况下Vetot相似,但SIMV和A/C期间的Vemech大于IMV期间。SIMV期间Vtmech增加,并且根据研究设计,A/C期间的Vtmech小于IMV期间。与IMV相比,SIMV和A/C期间Pe降低,A/C期间的Paw高于IMV或SIMV期间。与IMV相比,SIMV和A/C期间的逐搏ABP波动减小,并且与Pe变化呈密切正相关。我们得出结论,与IMV相比,SIMV增加了Vemech并降低了Pe,导致胸内和ABP波动更小。在A/C期间,很大一部分自主呼吸用力转移到了呼吸机上,导致Pe和ABP波动进一步降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验