Ogden T H
Int J Psychoanal. 1996 Oct;77 ( Pt 5):883-99.
In this paper three aspects of analytic technique are reconsidered from the perspective that analytic technique must serve the analytic process. The author views the analytic process as centrally involving the unconscious interplay of states of reverie of analyst and analysand, leading to the creation of a third subject of analysis. It is through the shared but asymmetrical experiencing of the 'analytic third' that analyst and analysand acquire a sense of, and generate symbols for, formerly unspoken and unthought aspects of the internal object world of the analysand. The state of reverie of the analytic pair requires conditions of privacy that must be safeguarded by analytic technique. From the perspective of the foregoing conception of the analytic process, the author attempts in the first part of this paper to reconsider the role of the couch in the analytic process. The second and third sections are devoted to a re-examination of aspects of analytic technique relating to the 'fundamental rule' of psychoanalysis and to the analysis of dreams.
本文从分析技术必须服务于分析过程这一视角,重新审视了分析技术的三个方面。作者认为分析过程主要涉及分析师与受分析者幻想状态的无意识互动,从而产生了第三个分析主体。正是通过对“分析第三者”的共同但不对称的体验,分析师和受分析者才获得了一种感受,并为受分析者内部客体世界中以前未说出口和未被思考的方面生成象征符号。分析双方的幻想状态需要隐私条件,而这必须由分析技术来保障。基于上述对分析过程的概念,作者在本文第一部分试图重新思考躺椅在分析过程中的作用。第二和第三部分致力于重新审视与精神分析的“基本规则”以及梦的分析相关的分析技术方面。