Penrose J M, Williams N W, Hose D R, Trowbridge E A
Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, UK.
J Med Eng Technol. 1996 Jul-Oct;20(4-5):145-50. doi: 10.3109/03091909609008394.
Reconstruction of the rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is generally achieved by means of implantation of a hinged silastic prosthesis. These implants reduce the pain in joint and restore some degree of mobility. However, they are prone to failure after a relatively short life-span. In this study, two popular designs of MCP implant, the Swanson and the Sutter, were compared by means of three-dimensional finite element analysis. The aim was to examine how the differing geometry effected their relative stiffness as replacement joints, and whether they were inherently prone to high stress concentrations during flexion. Although the Swanson design implant exhibited relatively greater resistance to flexion, both designs showed regions of high stress concentration and it was noted that neither was without its limitations. The use of the finite element technique was found to be an excellent way to provide preliminary design evaluation information, allowing further evolution before clinical trials.
类风湿性掌指关节(MCP)的重建通常通过植入铰链式硅橡胶假体来实现。这些植入物可减轻关节疼痛并恢复一定程度的活动能力。然而,它们在相对较短的使用寿命后容易失效。在本研究中,通过三维有限元分析比较了两种常见的MCP植入物设计,即斯旺森(Swanson)和萨特(Sutter)设计。目的是研究不同的几何形状如何影响它们作为替代关节的相对刚度,以及它们在屈曲过程中是否天生容易出现高应力集中。尽管斯旺森设计的植入物对屈曲表现出相对更大的抵抗力,但两种设计都显示出高应力集中区域,并且注意到两者都有其局限性。发现使用有限元技术是提供初步设计评估信息的绝佳方法,可在临床试验之前进行进一步改进。