• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Faking Bad in Workers Compensation Psychological Assessments: Elevation Rates of Negative Distortion Scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in an Australian Sample.工伤赔偿心理评估中的伪装不良:澳大利亚样本中《人格评估量表》负面失真量表的升高率
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Mar 8;24(5):682-693. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1291295. eCollection 2017.
2
Malingering and Defensiveness on the Spanish Personality Assessment Inventory: An Initial Investigation with Mostly Spanish-Speaking Outpatients.《西班牙人格评估量表中的诈病与防御性:针对主要讲西班牙语的门诊患者的初步调查》
Assessment. 2020 Sep;27(6):1163-1175. doi: 10.1177/1073191118778895. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.假装精神障碍的 PAI 负性扭曲量表的交叉验证:研究报告。
Assessment. 2013 Feb;20(1):36-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191112451493. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
4
Detecting Feigning in Adolescents on the Personality Assessment Inventory-Adolescent Form.人格评估量表-青少年版中青少年装病的检测。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Nov-Dec;102(6):751-757. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1693389. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Specificity and item endorsement rates of personality assessment inventory over-reporting scales across ethnic, gender, and diagnostic groups in a forensic inpatient sample.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Jan-Feb;74:101669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101669. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
The Effectiveness of the Personality Assessment Inventory With Feigned PTSD: An Initial Investigation of Resnick's Model of Malingering.伪装创伤后应激障碍情况下人格评估量表的有效性:雷斯尼克诈病模型的初步调查
Assessment. 2015 Aug;22(4):449-58. doi: 10.1177/1073191114552076. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
7
The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning.明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)和人格评估问卷(PAI)效度量表及指标检测有指导和无指导伪装的预测能力。
J Pers Assess. 2002 Feb;78(1):69-86. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_05.
8
Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29.使用 PAI 和 IOP-29 检测不同症状表现的伪装
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):565-579. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061282. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.使用多个 PAI 量表升高来检测装病:一个新指标。
Assessment. 2013 Aug;20(4):437-47. doi: 10.1177/1073191112458146. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Relationship of Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) over-reporting scales to performance validity testing in a military neuropsychological sample.军事神经心理学样本中人格评估量表(PAI)过度报告量表与效绩效度测试的关系
Mil Psychol. 2022 Mar 29;34(4):484-493. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.2013059. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Fitness-to-work considerations in the paradigmatic pain condition of headache disorder.头痛障碍典型疼痛状况下的工作适应性考量
J Headache Pain. 2025 Jan 31;26(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01960-1.
2
Knowledge of Depression and Malingering: An Exploratory Investigation.抑郁症与诈病的认知:一项探索性调查。
Eur J Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;16(1):32-44. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i1.1730. eCollection 2020 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the gold standard: a review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.评估金标准:对《症状报告的结构化访谈》的评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):95-107. doi: 10.1037/a0021149.
2
Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review.人格评估量表中心理病理学过度报告的检测:一项元分析综述
Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1037/a0015036.
3
A case law survey of the Personality Assessment Inventory: examining its role in civil and criminal trials.《人格评估量表的判例法调查:审视其在民事和刑事审判中的作用》
J Pers Assess. 2008 May;90(3):300-3. doi: 10.1080/00223890701885084.
4
A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort.一项关于神经心理学家在努力评估方面的信念和实践的调查。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
5
Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: a comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS.精神科病房及普通监狱服刑人员中诈病的检测:人格评估问卷(PAI)、症状自评量表(SIMS)及结构化访谈报告量表(SIRS)的比较
J Pers Assess. 2007 Feb;88(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/00223890709336832.
6
Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients.人格评估问卷(PAI)中的欺骗性:一项关于精神病住院患者单纯伪装的研究。
J Pers Assess. 2007 Feb;88(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/00223890709336830.
7
Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory.使用人格评估量表对刑事司法样本中的诈病进行筛查。
Psychol Assess. 2006 Dec;18(4):415-23. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.415.
8
Damages and rewards: assessment of malingered disorders in compensation cases.损害与回报:赔偿案件中诈病的评估
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(5):645-58. doi: 10.1002/bsl.687.
9
Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers' compensation "stress" claim sample.工伤赔偿“应激”索赔样本中的不可信精神和认知症状
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):754-65. doi: 10.1080/13854040500428467.
10
Detecting malingering: a survey of experts' practices.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Jun;19(4):465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.04.001.

工伤赔偿心理评估中的伪装不良:澳大利亚样本中《人格评估量表》负面失真量表的升高率

Faking Bad in Workers Compensation Psychological Assessments: Elevation Rates of Negative Distortion Scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in an Australian Sample.

作者信息

Yoxall Jacqueline, Bahr Mark, O'Neill Thomas

机构信息

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coolangatta, QLD, Australia.

School of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Mar 8;24(5):682-693. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1291295. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2017.1291295
PMID:31983982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6820062/
Abstract

The workers compensation system provides a clear external incentive for deliberate feigning of physical or mental illness to some individuals. Although it has been asserted that all pre-liability workers compensation psychological assessments should involve assessment of deliberate feigning, the lack of an agreed standard for assessing this response style creates a substantial challenge in practice. Over the last two decades, substantial attention has been given to measures of psychopathology that also include validated negative distortion indices. The Personality Assessment Inventory) has been validated in both the clinical and forensic population, and is reportedly used by many Australian psychologists. This study explores rates of elevation of negative distortion scales on the PAI as a potential indicator of deliberate feigning in a large Australian workers compensation sample.

摘要

工人赔偿制度为一些人故意伪装身体或精神疾病提供了明确的外部诱因。尽管有人断言,所有责任认定前的工人赔偿心理评估都应包括对故意伪装的评估,但缺乏评估这种反应方式的统一标准在实践中构成了重大挑战。在过去二十年里,人们对精神病理学测量给予了大量关注,这些测量也包括经过验证的负性扭曲指标。《人格评估问卷》已在临床和法医人群中得到验证,据报道许多澳大利亚心理学家都在使用。本研究探讨了在一个大型澳大利亚工人赔偿样本中,作为故意伪装潜在指标的《人格评估问卷》负性扭曲量表的升高率。