Shallice T, Burgess P
Department of Psychology, University College London, U.K.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1405-11; discussion 1411-2. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0124.
The possibility that the supervisory system of Norman & Shallice (1986) can be fractionated into different subprocesses is discussed. It is argued that confronting a novel situation effectively requires a variety of different types of process. It is then argued that evidence of separability of different processes may be obtained by the observation of very low correlations across patients on more than one measure on each of which frontal patients show a performance deficit. Examples of this are provided by examining the Hayling sentence completion and the Brixton spatial anticipation tasks. Finally, differential localization of the subprocesses and hence the conclusion that they are separable is discussed with respect to the localization of monitoring and verification processes in memory.
本文讨论了诺曼和沙利思（1986年）的监督系统可细分为不同子过程的可能性。有人认为，有效应对新情况需要多种不同类型的过程。接着有人指出，通过观察不同患者在不止一项测量上的极低相关性，可能获得不同过程可分离的证据，而额叶受损患者在每项测量上都表现出功能缺陷。通过研究海林句子完成任务和布里克斯顿空间预期任务可提供此类示例。最后，结合记忆中监控和验证过程的定位，讨论了子过程的差异定位以及它们可分离的结论。
