Suppr超能文献

躯体标记假说与前额叶皮质的可能功能

The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.

作者信息

Damasio A R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1413-20. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0125.

Abstract

In this article I discuss a hypothesis, known as the somatic marker hypothesis, which I believe is relevant to the understanding of processes of human reasoning and decision making. The ventromedial sector of the prefrontal cortices is critical to the operations postulated here, but the hypothesis does not necessarily apply to prefrontal cortex as a whole and should not be seen as an attempt to unify frontal lobe functions under a single mechanism. The key idea in the hypothesis is that 'marker' signals influence the processes of response to stimuli, at multiple levels of operation, some of which occur overtly (consciously, 'in mind') and some of which occur covertly (non-consciously, in a non-minded manner). The marker signals arise in bioregulatory processes, including those which express themselves in emotions and feelings, but are not necessarily confined to those alone. This is the reason why the markers are termed somatic: they relate to body-state structure and regulation even when they do not arise in the body proper but rather in the brain's representation of the body. Examples of the covert action of 'marker' signals are the undeliberated inhibition of a response learned previously; the introduction of a bias in the selection of an aversive or appetitive mode of behaviour, or in the otherwise deliberate evaluation of varied option-outcome scenarios. Examples of overt action include the conscious 'qualifying' of certain option-outcome scenarios as dangerous or advantageous. The hypothesis rejects attempts to limit human reasoning and decision making to mechanisms relying, in an exclusive and unrelated manner, on either conditioning alone or cognition alone.

摘要

在本文中,我将讨论一种被称为躯体标记假说的假设,我认为它与理解人类推理和决策过程相关。前额叶皮质的腹内侧区域对于此处所假设的运作至关重要,但该假设并不一定适用于整个前额叶皮质,也不应被视为试图用单一机制统一额叶功能。该假设的关键思想是,“标记”信号在多个操作层面影响对刺激的反应过程,其中一些是公开发生的(有意识地,“在脑海中”),而一些是隐蔽发生的(无意识地,以非刻意的方式)。标记信号产生于生物调节过程,包括那些在情感和感觉中表现出来的过程,但不一定仅限于此。这就是为什么这些标记被称为躯体标记的原因:它们与身体状态结构和调节有关,即使它们并非产生于身体本身,而是产生于大脑对身体的表征。“标记”信号隐蔽作用的例子包括对先前习得反应的未加思考的抑制;在选择厌恶或喜好行为模式时引入偏差,或者在对各种选项 - 结果情景进行刻意评估时引入偏差。公开作用的例子包括有意识地将某些选项 - 结果情景判定为危险或有利。该假设反对将人类推理和决策局限于仅依赖单独的条件作用或仅依赖认知的机制,且这些机制相互独立且毫无关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验