Suppr超能文献

Is delayed surgery really better for congenital diaphragmatic hernia?: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

de la Hunt M N, Madden N, Scott J E, Matthews J N, Beck J, Sadler C, Barrett A M, Boddy S A, Bray R J, Cusick E, Gardner L, Hargrave S A, Hinton W, Rangecroft L, Spicer R, Stafford M, Thomas D, Vallis C J, Wagget J

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Nov;31(11):1554-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90176-1.

Abstract

Delayed surgery has become widely accepted in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia after comparing outcomes only with historical retrospective controls. It was the aim of this study to compare early and delayed hernia repair in a randomized prospective clinical trial. Fifty-four infants were randomized to receive either early repair (within 4 hours of admission) or delayed repair (more than 24 hours after birth). The survival rate was higher for the delayed group (57% v 46%), but the difference was not significant (difference: -11; 95% confidence limits: -37.5, 15.5). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to length of hospital stay, ventilator dependency, or survival time. Recorded preoperative risk factors were similar for the two groups. Eight infants in the delayed repair group died without having undergone surgery. The optimum time for surgery still needs clarification.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验