Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Reverter J C, Carmona F, Tàssies D, Font J, Vanrell J A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Spain.
Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11(10):2310-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019095.
Routine screening for circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), namely the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), was carried out in a total of 1273 women aged < 45 years. Of them, 822 were experimental subjects and 451 were controls. The former comprised the following three study groups: 498 infertile patients (group 1), 284 spontaneous recurrent aborters (group 2), and 40 patients with repeated failure of embryo transfer (group 3). Controls included five groups of women: 125 normal healthy women who had never been pregnant (group 4), 125 normal healthy parous women with no previous abortion (group 5), 52 women in labour after normal pregnancies at term (group 6), 49 infertile patients achieving a livebirth with their first in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (group 7), and 100 female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (positive controls, group 8). aPL positivity in the eight groups studied was as follows: 24, 9.2, 10, 0.8, 0, 0, 0 and 42% respectively for groups 1 to 8. There were no differences within groups 1 and 3 regarding incidence of aPL when patients were grouped according to infertility aetiological factors and indications of IVF respectively. Twenty-six out of 284 recurrent aborters (9.2%) tested positive for aPL, and the LA and/or a CL were identified as the aetiological factor in 12% of patients (24/199) with supposedly unexplained recurrent abortion. Incidence of positive sera for aPL in group 1 was similar to that observed in control groups 4, 5 and 6. On the contrary, incidence of aPL positivity in groups 2 and 3 was significantly higher than in control groups 4, 5 and 6 and among infertile women (group 1). The difference between groups 3 and 7 almost reached statistical significance. Interestingly, there was no difference between groups 2 and 3, but groups 2 and 7 resulted probably different regarding incidence of aPL positive sera. As expected, the highest incidence of patients testing positive for aPL was found in group 8. Seven infertile patients having circulating aPL and becoming pregnant spontaneously or after specific infertility treatment, successfully carried to term in spite of the fact that they did not receive immunotherapy. Among recurrent aborters, the live-born baby rate was significantly higher after treatment with low-dose aspirin than prior therapy. It is concluded that the presence of circulating aPL may be associated with recurrent abortion but with infertility. In addition, our results favour a possible role of aPL in failure of implantation after IVF embryo transfer.
对总共1273名年龄小于45岁的女性进行了循环抗磷脂抗体(aPL)的常规筛查,即狼疮抗凝物(LA)和抗心磷脂抗体(aCL)。其中,822名是实验对象,451名是对照。前者包括以下三个研究组:498名不孕患者(第1组)、284名自然复发性流产者(第2组)和40名胚胎移植反复失败的患者(第3组)。对照组包括五组女性:125名从未怀孕的正常健康女性(第4组)、125名无既往流产史的正常健康经产妇(第5组)、52名足月正常妊娠后分娩的女性(第6组)、49名首次体外受精(IVF)和胚胎移植后活产的不孕患者(第7组)以及100名系统性红斑狼疮女性患者(阳性对照,第8组)。所研究的八组中aPL阳性率如下:第1至8组分别为24%、9.2%、10%、0.8%、0%、0%、0%和42%。当根据不孕病因和IVF指征对患者进行分组时,第1组和第3组内aPL的发生率没有差异。284名复发性流产者中有26名(9.2%)aPL检测呈阳性,在12%(24/199)疑似不明原因复发性流产的患者中,LA和/或aCL被确定为病因。第1组中aPL阳性血清的发生率与第4、5和6组对照组中观察到的相似。相反,第2组和第3组中aPL阳性的发生率显著高于第4、5和6组对照组以及不孕女性(第1组)。第3组和第7组之间的差异几乎达到统计学意义。有趣的是,第2组和第3组之间没有差异,但第2组和第7组在aPL阳性血清发生率方面可能有所不同。正如预期的那样,第8组中aPL检测呈阳性的患者发生率最高。7名患有循环aPL的不孕患者在自然受孕或经过特定不孕治疗后怀孕,尽管未接受免疫治疗,但成功足月分娩。在复发性流产者中,低剂量阿司匹林治疗后的活产婴儿率显著高于先前治疗。结论是,循环aPL的存在可能与复发性流产有关,但与不孕无关。此外,我们的结果支持aPL在IVF胚胎移植后着床失败中可能起的作用。