Foutch P G, Zimmerman K
Department of Pathology, Desert Samaritan Hospital, Mesa, Arizona, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Dec;91(12):2589-93.
Over a 3-yr period, we performed colonoscopy on five patients (mean age 71 yr) in whom a specific diverticulum that contained a pigmented protuberance (PiP) was unequivocally identified as the cause for hemorrhage. Four of these individuals had endoscopic bipolar cauterization of the PiP, and two patients had surgery.
To (1) determine the clinical significance of an intradiverticular PiP, (2) correlate endoscopic features of a PiP with histopathological findings and, (3) assess results of endoscopic treatment for affected patients with lower GI bleeding.
Medical charts were reviewed to garner data and assess outcome for patients. The bleeding diverticulum in one surgical case was detected in the resected specimen, and histological examination was performed.
The mean number of transfusions, bleeding days, and lowest hemoglobin concentration before definitive treatment was 4.8, 3.4, and 8.4 gm%, respectively. All patients rebled before treatment. In all instances, the PiP projected through the neck of the diverticulum, which was actively bleeding in two patients. Endoscopic bipolar cautery directed at the PiP achieved permanent hemostasis in three of four subjects (75%) (morbidity 0%). Endoscopic therapy failed in one subject, and a hemicolectomy was performed. Histological evaluation of the resected specimen showed erosion of a medium sized artery into the diverticulum. The PiP represented a sentinel clot (not a visible vessel) adherent to a breach in the vessel wall. A patient who had surgery instead of endoscopic therapy had a prolonged, complicated postoperative course.
(1) The presence of an intradiverticular PiP may identify a subset of patients at risk for severe recurrent diverticular bleeding. (2) Histopathological analysis showed the PiP to be a sentinel clot rather than a visible vessel. (3) In patients with severe recurrent diverticular bleeding, endoscopic treatment of the vessel beneath this lesion may be a viable alternative to surgery.
在3年的时间里,我们对5例患者(平均年龄71岁)进行了结肠镜检查,这些患者中明确发现一个含有色素性隆起(PiP)的特定憩室是出血原因。其中4例患者接受了PiP的内镜下双极电凝治疗,2例患者接受了手术。
(1)确定憩室内PiP的临床意义,(2)将PiP的内镜特征与组织病理学结果相关联,(3)评估内镜治疗对下消化道出血患者的效果。
查阅病历以收集数据并评估患者的预后。在一个手术病例中,在切除的标本中检测到出血憩室,并进行了组织学检查。
在确定性治疗前,平均输血次数、出血天数和最低血红蛋白浓度分别为4.8次、3.4天和8.4克%。所有患者在治疗前均再次出血。在所有情况下,PiP都从憩室颈部突出,其中2例患者憩室颈部有活动性出血。针对PiP进行的内镜下双极电凝治疗在4名受试者中的3名(75%)实现了永久性止血(发病率为0%)。1名受试者内镜治疗失败,随后进行了半结肠切除术。切除标本的组织学评估显示,一条中等大小的动脉向憩室内侵蚀。PiP代表附着在血管壁破裂处的哨兵血块(而非可见血管)。一名接受手术而非内镜治疗的患者术后病程延长且复杂。
(1)憩室内PiP的存在可能识别出有严重复发性憩室出血风险的一部分患者。(2)组织病理学分析显示PiP是一个哨兵血块而非可见血管。(3)对于严重复发性憩室出血的患者,对该病变下方血管进行内镜治疗可能是一种可行的手术替代方案。