Foutch P G
Division of Gastroenterology, Desert Samaritan Hospital, Mesa, Arizona, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct;90(10):1779-84.
This retrospective study was performed to determine if certain endoscopic features of a bleeding diverticulum predict outcome for patients and to assess the role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) as a risk factor for hemorrhage.
Over a 28-month period, colonoscopy was performed on 13 patients (mean, age 74 yr) in whom a specific diverticulum was unequivocally identified as a cause for bleeding. Endoscopic features of the affected diverticulum were recorded and correlated with outcome for patients. Drug histories were reviewed to document use of NSAID before bleeding.
Three patients had a visible vessel located inside a diverticulum, and one subject had an adherent clot with active bleeding. These colonoscopic findings were classified as stigmata of significant hemorrhage (SSH). In the remaining nine patients the diverticula were ulcerated. This endoscopic finding was classified as stigmata of insignificant hemorrhage (SIH). Compared with patients with SIH, individuals with SSH experienced a greater number of bleeding episodes (3.5 vs 1.3, p = 0.006), had a lower initial hemoglobin concentration (8.2 vs 12.5 gm%, p = 0.009), and required more transfusions (3.3 vs 0, p = 0.04) and invasive treatments (75% with SSH were managed by endoscopy or surgery vs 0% for those with SIH, p = 0.01). Ninety-two percent of the patients were taking NSAID (100% with SSH and 89% with SIH). Seventy-five percent of subjects with SSH compared with 0% of patients with SIH had a combined exposure to NSAID and ASA (p = 0.01).
Presence of a visible vessel or an adherent clot with active bleeding is a reliable marker for significant hemorrhage. Ulcerated diverticula are the cause of trivial bleeding, and presence of this endoscopic finding accurately predicts a benign clinical course. NSAID may be an important risk factor for diverticular bleeding. It is possible that combined exposure to NSAID and ASA results in more severe bleeding compared with use of NSAID alone.
进行这项回顾性研究以确定出血性憩室的某些内镜特征是否可预测患者的预后,并评估非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)作为出血危险因素的作用。
在28个月期间,对13例患者(平均年龄74岁)进行了结肠镜检查,其中明确将一个特定憩室确定为出血原因。记录受影响憩室的内镜特征,并与患者的预后相关联。回顾用药史以记录出血前NSAID的使用情况。
3例患者在憩室内可见血管,1例患者有附着的血凝块并有活动性出血。这些结肠镜检查结果被归类为严重出血的征象(SSH)。其余9例患者的憩室有溃疡。这一内镜检查结果被归类为轻微出血的征象(SIH)。与SIH患者相比,SSH患者的出血发作次数更多(3.5次对1.3次,p = 0.006),初始血红蛋白浓度更低(8.2 g%对12.5 g%,p = 0.009),需要更多的输血(3.3次对0次,p = 0.04)和侵入性治疗(SSH患者中有75%通过内镜检查或手术治疗,而SIH患者为0%,p = 0.01)。92%的患者正在服用NSAID(SSH患者中为100%,SIH患者中为89%)。与SIH患者的0%相比,SSH患者中有75%同时使用了NSAID和ASA(p = 0.01)。
可见血管或有附着的血凝块并有活动性出血是严重出血的可靠标志。溃疡型憩室是轻微出血的原因,这一内镜检查结果的存在准确预测了良性临床病程。NSAID可能是憩室出血的重要危险因素。与单独使用NSAID相比,同时使用NSAID和ASA可能导致更严重的出血。