Bufalari A, Giustozzi G, Moggi L
Department of Surgery and Surgical Emergencies, Unversity of Perugia, Italy.
Acta Chir Belg. 1996 Sep-Oct;96(5):197-200.
The optimal treatment of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses has not yet been defined and mortality and morbidity remain high. In this retrospective study 2.310 laparotomies were reviewed. The records of 39 patients with postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (1.6%) are reported and the results obtained in percutaneous drainage (PD, n = 27) versus surgical drainage (SD, n = 10) are compared. The choice of drainage was made after consultation with the interventional radiologist, and PD was preferred in single, well-defined abscesses. Two patients had prompt spontaneous resolution of the abscess. The two groups were homogeneous for age, sex and postoperative day of abscess diagnosis. There was no difference in severity of illness assessed by Acute Physiologic Score (APS) between PD and SD groups (7.9 vs 9.3). No significant difference was found in mortality (11% vs 20%), morbidity (11% vs 40%) and duration of drain tube (14 vs 15 days) between PD group and SD group. This study confirms the data of recent retrospective stratified series: PD and SD are equally efficacious to cure postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. However, PD should be the treatment of choice because of its lower invasiveness and cost.
术后腹腔内脓肿的最佳治疗方法尚未明确,死亡率和发病率仍然很高。在这项回顾性研究中,对2310例剖腹手术进行了回顾。报告了39例术后腹腔内脓肿患者(占1.6%)的记录,并比较了经皮引流(PD,n = 27)与手术引流(SD,n = 10)的结果。引流方式的选择是在与介入放射科医生协商后做出的,对于单一、界限清楚的脓肿,首选经皮引流。2例患者的脓肿迅速自行消退。两组在年龄、性别和脓肿诊断后的术后天数方面具有同质性。经皮引流组和手术引流组通过急性生理评分(APS)评估的疾病严重程度无差异(7.9对9.3)。经皮引流组和手术引流组在死亡率(11%对20%)、发病率(11%对40%)和引流管留置时间(14天对15天)方面未发现显著差异。本研究证实了近期回顾性分层系列研究的数据:经皮引流和手术引流在治疗术后腹腔内脓肿方面同样有效。然而,由于经皮引流的侵入性较低且成本较低,应作为首选治疗方法。