Putnam F W, Carlson E B, Ross C A, Anderson G, Clark P, Torem M, Bowman E S, Coons P, Chu J A, Dill D L, Loewenstein R J, Braun B G
Unit on Developmental Traumatology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Nov;184(11):673-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199611000-00004.
Research has consistently found elevated mean dissociation scores in particular diagnostic groups. In this study, we explored whether mean dissociation scores for different diagnostic groups resulted from uniform distributions of scores within the group or were a function of the proportion of highly dissociative patients that the diagnostic group contained. A total of 1566 subjects who were psychiatric patients, neurological patients, normal adolescents, or normal adult subjects completed the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES). An analysis of the percentage of subjects with high DES scores in each diagnostic group indicated that the diagnostic group's mean DES scores were a function of the proportion of subjects within the group who were high dissociators. The results contradict a continuum model of dissociation but are consistent with the existence of distinct dissociative types.
研究一直发现，特定诊断组的平均解离分数有所升高。在本研究中，我们探讨了不同诊断组的平均解离分数是由组内分数的均匀分布导致的，还是诊断组中高度解离患者比例的函数。共有1566名精神科患者、神经科患者、正常青少年或正常成年受试者完成了解离体验量表（DES）。对每个诊断组中DES高分受试者百分比的分析表明，诊断组的平均DES分数是组内高度解离受试者比例的函数。结果与解离的连续体模型相矛盾，但与不同解离类型的存在相一致。
