Ontell F K, Ivanovic M, Ablin D S, Barlow T W
Department of Radiology, Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento 95817, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Dec;167(6):1395-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956565.
Determination of skeletal or bone age is often used in pediatrics and orthopedics. The most commonly used bone age standards in the United States, those published by Greulich and Pyle, were derived from white children of the upper socioeconomic class in 1931-1942. We examined whether these standards apply to the current assessment of bone age in children of diverse ethnicity.
Hand radiographs of children less than 19 years old at our institution were evaluated for bone age using the standards of Greulich and Pyle. Differences between bone age and chronologic age were calculated, and the mean differences were compared among subgroups of children on the basis of sex, age, and ethnicity.
In Asian and white girls, bone age approximated chronologic age throughout childhood, with the only significant discrepancy being in adolescent white girls, in whom bone age exceeded chronologic age by an average of 4 months. In black girls, bone age exceeded chronologic age except during middle childhood. In late childhood and adolescence, bone age exceeded chronologic age by approximately 10 months. In Hispanic adolescent girls, bone age exceeded chronologic age by nearly 9 months. In black adolescent boys, bone age exceeded chronologic age by 5 months, with no significant discrepancies between bone age and chronologic age at other ages. In white preadolescent boys, bone age lagged behind chronologic age to a statistically significant degree, ranging from approximately 4 to 8 months. Preadolescent Asian boys also showed significant delays in bone age, particularly in middle childhood, when bone age lagged behind chronologic age by nearly 15 months. In adolescent Asian boys, bone age exceeded chronologic age by 9 months 15 days. In adolescent Hispanic boys, bone age exceeded chronologic age by 11 months 15 days. In younger Hispanic boys, delays in bone age occurred but were significant only in early childhood (4-month delay).
Using the standards of Greulich and Pyle to determine bone age must be done with reservations, particularly in black and Hispanic girls and in Asian and Hispanic boys in late childhood and adolescence, when bone age may exceed chronologic age by 9 months to 11 months 15 days.
骨骼或骨龄测定常用于儿科和骨科。美国最常用的骨龄标准是格罗利希和派尔公布的标准,这些标准源自1931年至1942年社会经济阶层较高的白人儿童。我们研究了这些标准是否适用于当前对不同种族儿童骨龄的评估。
使用格罗利希和派尔的标准对我院19岁以下儿童的手部X光片进行骨龄评估。计算骨龄与实际年龄的差异,并根据性别、年龄和种族对儿童亚组的平均差异进行比较。
在亚洲和白人女孩中,整个童年期骨龄接近实际年龄,唯一显著的差异在于青春期白人女孩,其骨龄平均比实际年龄超出4个月。在黑人女孩中,除童年中期外,骨龄均超过实际年龄。在童年晚期和青春期,骨龄比实际年龄超出约10个月。在西班牙裔青春期女孩中,骨龄比实际年龄超出近9个月。在黑人青春期男孩中,骨龄比实际年龄超出5个月,在其他年龄段骨龄与实际年龄无显著差异。在白人青春期前男孩中,骨龄在统计学上显著落后于实际年龄,相差约4至8个月。青春期前的亚洲男孩也显示出骨龄显著延迟,尤其是在童年中期,此时骨龄比实际年龄落后近15个月。在亚洲青春期男孩中,骨龄比实际年龄超出9个月15天。在西班牙裔青春期男孩中,骨龄比实际年龄超出11个月15天。在较年幼的西班牙裔男孩中,骨龄出现延迟,但仅在幼儿期显著(延迟4个月)。
使用格罗利希和派尔的标准来确定骨龄必须谨慎,尤其是在黑人及西班牙裔女孩以及童年晚期和青春期的亚洲及西班牙裔男孩中,此时骨龄可能比实际年龄超出9个月至11个月15天。