Suppr超能文献

[全血和红细胞浓缩物质量对自体输血的重要性。体内红细胞回收率的文献综述与荟萃分析]

[The importance of quality of whole blood and erythrocyte concentrates for autologous transfusion. A literature survey and meta-analysis of in vivo erythrocyte recovery].

作者信息

Karger R, Kretschmer V

机构信息

Abteilung für Transfusionsmedizin und Gerinnungsphysiologie, Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1996 Aug;45(8):694-707. doi: 10.1007/s001010050302.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The separation of whole blood into components is the state-of-the-art in transfusion of allogeneic blood. The main reasons are the negative effects of the buffy coat and the need for FFP. Nevertheless, especially in Germany whole blood is being rejected more and more even as autologous blood. However, most of the negative effects of the buffy coat do not apply to autologous blood. Additionally, these patients usually do not develop coagulation disorders and therefore do not need plasma as a hemostatic component. On the other hand, separation into components of autologous blood leads to an increase of costs and to logistic problems that restrict autologous blood predeposit to a few institutions. Therefore, we have reviewed the literature in order to find a scientific basis for this.

METHODS

We analysed all articles listed by MEDLINE during the last 12 years that dealt with the quality of whole blood or red cell concentrates. In addition, all references were included that contributed relevant information to the topic. A total of 135 original articles, abstracts, reviews, letters or editorials were analysed that referred to standard preparations and storage media. In 48 papers the in vivo red cell survival was studied. 28 of which fulfilled the prerequisites to be included into a meta-analysis. The following in vitro parameters were also evaluated: pH, potassium load of the units, ATP and DPG concentration of the red cells.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Whole blood (resuspended in CPDA-1) and red cell units (stabilized in CPDA-1 or additive solutions) with a different buffy coat or leucocyte content have comparable pH values and red cell 2,3-DPG and ATP concentrations at the end of the approved storage time. The potassium load of a whole blood unit appears to be higher than red cell concentrates, but this is to some extent caused by the higher plasma content of whole blood and is not thought to be a clinically relevant problem for patients receiving only a few units. A number of studies demonstrate that dependent upon the leucocyte content of a red cell unit, leucocyte metabolites and enzymes are released and accumulate during storage. A detrimental influence on the integrity of the red cell membrane was found in several in vitro studies. Nevertheless, a significant improvement in red cell survival by leucocyte reduction was detected by only one group. Undoubtedly, nonhemolytic febrile transfusion reactions (NHFTR) are generally caused by an antibody-antigen interaction due to the transfusion of allogeneic buffy coat. On the other hand, there is some evidence that non-specific immunological mechanisms such as the release of histamine or cytokines are also capable of causing NHFTR. Thus, these reactions are expected to occur in autologous blood transfusion. However, so far, there are no data about the frequency and severity of these reactions and whether they are more likely to emerge after transfusion of blood units with a particular preparation. Blood transfusions can cause septic complications due to bacterial contamination of the transfused units. These fatal but rare complications may be reduced by pre-storage filtration of blood, but there is no indication that buffy coat reduction is effective. Three cases with septic complications have been reported after autologous transfusion, in two of which red cell concentrates (at least one was free of buffy coat) had been used. Thus, there is no justification for the conclusion that the risk of septic complications is increased by transfusion of whole blood. After all, whole blood and red cell concentrates exhibit only minor differences in relevant in vitro parameters. Hence, a higher incidence of adverse effects following the transfusion of autologous whole blood compared to autologous red cell concentrations is unlikely. Therefore, the 24 h in vivo recovery is considered to be the most valid criterion to assess the quality of red cell preparations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

未标注

将全血分离成成分是异体输血的先进技术。主要原因是白膜层的负面影响以及对新鲜冰冻血浆的需求。然而,尤其是在德国,全血甚至作为自体血越来越多地被拒绝。然而,白膜层的大多数负面影响并不适用于自体血。此外,这些患者通常不会出现凝血障碍,因此不需要将血浆作为止血成分。另一方面,将自体血分离成成分会导致成本增加和后勤问题,这使得自体血预存仅在少数机构进行。因此,我们查阅了文献以找到其科学依据。

方法

我们分析了过去12年MEDLINE列出的所有涉及全血或红细胞浓缩物质量的文章。此外,纳入了所有提供与该主题相关信息的参考文献。总共分析了135篇涉及标准制剂和储存介质的原创文章、摘要、综述、信件或社论。48篇论文研究了体内红细胞存活情况。其中28篇符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。还评估了以下体外参数:pH值、单位钾负荷、红细胞的ATP和DPG浓度。

结果与讨论

具有不同白膜层或白细胞含量的全血(重悬于CPDA - 1中)和红细胞单位(稳定于CPDA - 1或添加剂溶液中)在批准的储存时间结束时具有可比的pH值以及红细胞2,3 - DPG和ATP浓度。全血单位的钾负荷似乎高于红细胞浓缩物,但这在一定程度上是由于全血的血浆含量较高,并且对于仅接受少量单位输血的患者而言,这不被认为是一个临床相关问题。一些研究表明,取决于红细胞单位的白细胞含量,白细胞代谢产物和酶在储存期间会释放并积累。在一些体外研究中发现了对红细胞膜完整性的有害影响。然而,只有一组检测到白细胞减少可显著改善红细胞存活。毫无疑问,非溶血性发热性输血反应(NHFTR)通常是由于异体白膜层输血引起的抗体 - 抗原相互作用所致。另一方面,有一些证据表明,非特异性免疫机制,如组胺或细胞因子的释放,也能够引起NHFTR。因此,预计这些反应会在自体输血中发生。然而,到目前为止,尚无关于这些反应的频率和严重程度以及它们在输注特定制剂的血液单位后是否更易出现的数据。输血可能因输血单位的细菌污染而导致败血症并发症。通过血液储存前过滤可减少这些致命但罕见的并发症,但没有迹象表明减少白膜层是有效的。有三例自体输血后发生败血症并发症的报告,其中两例使用了红细胞浓缩物(至少有一例无白膜层)。因此,没有理由得出输注全血会增加败血症并发症风险的结论。毕竟,全血和红细胞浓缩物在相关体外参数上仅表现出微小差异。因此,与自体红细胞浓缩物相比,自体全血输血后不良反应发生率更高的可能性不大。因此,24小时体内恢复被认为是评估红细胞制剂质量的最有效标准。(摘要截断)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验