Villafane M C, Cinnella G, Lofaso F, Isabey D, Harf A, Lemaire F, Brochard L
Department of Physiology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris XII, Créteil, France.
Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1341-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00015.
Limited data suggest that increased resistance to flow within endotracheal tubes (ETT) may occur in patients whose lungs are mechanically ventilated for more than 48 h, especially when airway humidification is inadequate. This could lead to sudden ETT obstruction or induce excessive loading during spontaneous breathing.
Twenty-three such patients were randomly assigned to three types of airway humidifier based on three different working principles: a Fisher Paykell hot water system (n = 7), a Pall BB2215 heat and moisture exchanger (HME) hydrophobic filter (n = 8), and a Dar Hygrobac 35254111 HME hygroscopic filter (n = 8). The decrease in internal pressure along the ETT and the flow rate were measured in each patient every 2 days. An "effective inner diameter" was derived from these measurements and allowed the inner ETT configuration to be monitored.
On the first day of intubation, the mean diameter was similar in the three groups, and was slightly smaller than the in vitro diameter (mean +/- SD: 7.6 +/- 0.6 mm for Fisher-Paykell, 7.7 +/- 0.4 for Pall, and 7.5 +/- 0.4 for Dar). The mean diameter tended to decrease from day to day. At the end of the study, the overall reduction in mean diameter was significantly greater with the hydrophobic HME (Pall) than with the two other systems (Pall: -6.5 +/- 4% vs. 2.5 +/- 2.5% for Dar and 1.5 +/- 3% for Fisher-Paykell; P < 0.01 with analysis of variance). The same was true of the mean reduction in effective inner ETT diameter expressed per day of ventilation (-1.6 +/- 1.5% per day for Pall vs. -0.5 +/- 0.4% for Dar and -0.2 +/- 0.4% for Fisher-Paykell; P < 0.01). In four patients, the ETT became obstructed and emergency repeated tracheal intubation was required. The Pall HME and the Fisher-Paykell system were being used in three and one patient, respectively. Before obstruction, the reduction in ETT diameter was significantly greater for these four patients than for the remaining 23 patients (7.8 +/- 1.4% vs. 3.1 +/- 4.1%; P < 0.01).
During prolonged mechanical ventilation, significant alterations in inner ETT configuration occur frequently and are influenced by the type of humidification device used. In vivo monitoring of ETT mechanical properties might be clinically useful.
有限的数据表明,接受机械通气超过48小时的患者,气管内插管(ETT)内的气流阻力可能会增加,尤其是在气道湿化不足时。这可能导致ETT突然阻塞,或在自主呼吸时引起负荷过大。
23例此类患者根据三种不同的工作原理被随机分配至三种气道湿化器:费雪派克热水系统(n = 7)、颇尔BB2215热湿交换器(HME)疏水滤器(n = 8)和达尔 Hygrobac 35254111 HME吸湿滤器(n = 8)。每2天测量每位患者ETT内的压力下降和流速。根据这些测量得出“有效内径”,从而监测ETT的内部结构。
插管第一天,三组的平均直径相似,略小于体外直径(均值±标准差:费雪派克为7.6±0.6 mm,颇尔为7.7±0.4,达尔为7.5±0.4)。平均直径有逐日减小的趋势。研究结束时,疏水HME(颇尔)的平均直径总体减小幅度显著大于其他两个系统(颇尔:-6.5±4%,达尔为2.5±2.5%,费雪派克为1.5±3%;方差分析P < 0.01)。按通气天数计算的ETT有效内径的平均减小幅度也是如此(颇尔每天-1.6±1.5%,达尔为-0.5±0.4%,费雪派克为-0.2±0.4%;P < 0.01)。4例患者的ETT发生阻塞,需要紧急再次气管插管。其中3例使用颇尔HME,1例使用费雪派克系统。阻塞前,这4例患者的ETT直径减小幅度显著大于其余23例患者(-7.8±1.4% 对 -3.1±4.1%;P < 0.01)。
在长时间机械通气期间,ETT内部结构经常发生显著改变,并受所用湿化装置类型的影响。对ETT机械性能进行体内监测可能具有临床意义。