Aarestrup F M, Jorsal S E, Ahrens P, Jensen N E, Meyling A
Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Copenhagen V, Denmark.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):20-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.20-24.1997.
The present study was conducted to investigate the epidemiological relationship of isolates of Escherichia coli causing edema disease. Classical edema disease has not previously been described in Denmark, but between February 1994 and November 1995 cases appeared in 51 pig herds, among which direct or indirect trading contacts were confirmed for 36 of the herds. A total of 213 isolates from pigs with edema disease in Denmark and other countries and 23 E. coli O139 isolates from pigs with diarrhea or healthy pigs were analyzed to characterize their O serogroups, HindIII ribotypes, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) types, and 183 of the isolates were also analyzed for their plasmid profiles. The resulting PFGE types of the isolates from pigs with edema disease were examined by cluster analysis. Ten isolates from three herds could not be typed with the available O antisera, whereas all other isolates were of serotype O139. However, all isolates from pigs with edema disease belonged to the same HindIII ribotype, which was not observed among the isolates from pigs with diarrhea or healthy pigs. All isolates from Danish pigs with edema disease except for three isolates originating from two herds belonged to the same or closely related XbaI PFGE types; the other three isolates were assigned to possibly related types. Isolates from pigs with edema disease in different countries belonged to different PFGE types. All isolates from Danish pigs with edema disease grouped together in one cluster, in contrast to isolates from other countries, which did not form any clusters. E. coli strains of serogroup O139 from pigs with diarrhea or isolated from the feces of healthy Danish pigs were very different. Plasmid profiles differed largely among isolates. However, among the isolates from Danish pigs with edema disease, one type predominated within herds. The present study indicated that most, if not all, of the observed cases of edema disease in Denmark were part of the same outbreak. The combination of PFGE typing and ribotyping was useful for studying the possible clonal relationship among strains, whereas plasmid profiling was less informative.
本研究旨在调查引起水肿病的大肠杆菌分离株的流行病学关系。丹麦此前未曾描述过典型的水肿病,但在1994年2月至1995年11月期间,51个猪群中出现了病例,其中36个猪群被证实存在直接或间接的贸易联系。对丹麦和其他国家患有水肿病的猪的213株分离株以及来自腹泻猪或健康猪的23株大肠杆菌O139分离株进行了分析,以确定它们的O血清群、HindIII核糖型和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)类型,并且对其中183株分离株的质粒图谱也进行了分析。通过聚类分析检查了患有水肿病的猪的分离株所得的PFGE类型。来自三个猪群的10株分离株无法用现有的O抗血清分型,而所有其他分离株均为O139血清型。然而,所有患有水肿病的猪的分离株都属于同一HindIII核糖型,在腹泻猪或健康猪的分离株中未观察到这种核糖型。除了来自两个猪群的3株分离株外,丹麦患有水肿病的猪的所有分离株都属于相同或密切相关的XbaI PFGE类型;其他3株分离株被归为可能相关的类型。来自不同国家患有水肿病的猪的分离株属于不同的PFGE类型。丹麦患有水肿病的猪的所有分离株聚集在一个聚类中,与此形成对比的是,来自其他国家的分离株未形成任何聚类。来自腹泻猪或从健康丹麦猪粪便中分离出的血清群O139大肠杆菌菌株差异很大。分离株之间的质粒图谱差异很大。然而,在丹麦患有水肿病的猪的分离株中,一种类型在猪群中占主导地位。本研究表明,丹麦观察到的大多数(如果不是全部)水肿病病例都是同一疫情的一部分。PFGE分型和核糖分型的组合有助于研究菌株之间可能的克隆关系,而质粒图谱分析提供的信息较少。