Helburn S W, Howes C
University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Future Child. 1996 Summer-Fall;6(2):62-82.
This article summarizes what is known about the cost and quality of full-time child care in centers and family child care homes, and about parents' attention to quality in making child care choices. It relies primarily upon two recent studies which are among the first to collect detailed information about child care operating costs: the Cost, Quality, and Child Outcomes in Child Care Centers study and the Economics of Family Child Care study. Results indicate that mediocre quality is the rule and that parents often do not choose quality settings for their children. At the present time, child care quality is only modestly related to the cost of providing services. In part, the modesty of this relationship reflects the low wages of child care staff, the availability of in-kind donations in the nonprofit sector, and the altruistic motivations of many providers that depress direct costs and the fees charged for child care. The article concludes with recommendations of future: (1) launch consumer education efforts; (2) implement higher standards for child care at the state level; (3) avoid public policies that encourage people to become child care providers if they have no interest in such a career; (4) increase public and private investments in child care; and (5) develop the means to compensate child care workers as is appropriate for their levels of training, experience, and responsibility.
本文总结了关于中心式全日制儿童保育和家庭式儿童保育的成本与质量,以及父母在选择儿童保育时对质量的关注等方面的已知情况。它主要依据两项近期的研究,这两项研究率先收集了有关儿童保育运营成本的详细信息:《儿童保育中心的成本、质量与儿童成果》研究以及《家庭式儿童保育经济学》研究。结果表明,质量平平是常态,而且父母通常不会为孩子选择高质量的保育环境。目前,儿童保育质量与提供服务的成本仅有适度关联。这种关联程度不高,部分原因在于儿童保育工作人员工资较低、非营利部门有实物捐赠,以及许多提供者的利他动机压低了直接成本和儿童保育收费。文章最后提出了未来的建议:(1)开展消费者教育工作;(2)在州一级实施更高的儿童保育标准;(3)避免出台鼓励对儿童保育事业毫无兴趣的人成为儿童保育提供者的公共政策;(4)增加对儿童保育的公共和私人投资;(5)制定相应方法,根据儿童保育工作者的培训水平、经验和职责给予适当报酬。