• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国不同特征县的肺癌发病率与平均氡水平对比

Lung cancer rate vs. mean radon level in U.S. counties of various characteristics.

作者信息

Cohen B L

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

出版信息

Health Phys. 1997 Jan;72(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199701000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00004032-199701000-00016
PMID:8972836
Abstract

Plots of lung cancer rates corrected for smoking prevalence vs. average home radon levels are presented for U.S. counties with a wide variety of socioeconomic characteristics. The data are generally well described by the same negative slope linear, plus positive slope quadratic, "standard" curve. Plots are presented for geographic regions and these are also reasonably well fit by the standard curve. The findings are not consistent with predictions based on a linear no-threshold model.

摘要

针对具有广泛社会经济特征的美国各县,给出了经吸烟率校正后的肺癌发病率与家庭平均氡水平的关系图。这些数据通常能很好地用相同的负斜率线性加正斜率二次“标准”曲线来描述。还给出了各地理区域的关系图,这些图也能较好地拟合标准曲线。研究结果与基于线性无阈模型的预测不一致。

相似文献

1
Lung cancer rate vs. mean radon level in U.S. counties of various characteristics.美国不同特征县的肺癌发病率与平均氡水平对比
Health Phys. 1997 Jan;72(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199701000-00016.
2
A test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis.辐射致癌线性无阈理论的一项测试。
Environ Res. 1990 Dec;53(2):193-220. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80119-7.
3
Tests of the linear-no threshold theory for lung cancer induced by exposure to radon.
Environ Res. 1994 Jan;64(1):65-89. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1994.1007.
4
Testing a BEIR-VI suggestion for explaining the lung cancer vs. radon relationship for U.S. counties.
Health Phys. 2000 May;78(5):522-7. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200005000-00009.
5
The residential radon-lung cancer association in U.S. counties: a commentary.美国各县住宅氡气与肺癌的关联:一篇评论
Health Phys. 1999 May;76(5):553-7. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199905000-00014.
6
Expected indoor 222Rn levels in counties with very high and very low lung cancer rates.肺癌发病率极高和极低的县的室内钍-222预期水平。
Health Phys. 1989 Dec;57(6):897-907. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198912000-00004.
7
Residential radon exposure and lung cancer: evidence of an urban factor in Iowa.居住环境中的氡暴露与肺癌:爱荷华州城市因素的证据。
Health Phys. 1994 Mar;66(3):263-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199403000-00005.
8
Small area mapping of domestic radon, smoking prevalence and lung cancer incidence--A case study in Northamptonshire, UK.英国北安普敦郡家庭氡气、吸烟率和肺癌发病率的小区域映射——一项案例研究
J Environ Radioact. 2015 Dec;150:159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
9
Problems in the radon vs lung cancer test of the linear no-threshold theory and a procedure for resolving them.
Health Phys. 1997 Apr;72(4):623-8. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199704000-00015.
10
High Radon Areas and lung cancer prevalence: Evidence from Ireland.高氡地区与肺癌患病率:来自爱尔兰的证据。
J Environ Radioact. 2018 Feb;182:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Breakthrough on Modeling Cancer Prevention and Elimination by Low Radiation Doses.低辐射剂量预防和消除癌症建模方面的一项突破。
Dose Response. 2025 Jul 7;23(3):15593258251359335. doi: 10.1177/15593258251359335. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Radiophobia Harm, Its Main Cause, and a Proposed Solution.辐射恐惧症的危害、主要成因及一种解决方案建议
Dose Response. 2025 Mar 27;23(1):15593258251318305. doi: 10.1177/15593258251318305. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
3
Are Assigned Low-Dose-Radiation Cancer Risks Based on Some Epidemiologic Studies Unreliable?
Dose Response. 2022 Jul 21;20(3):15593258221117049. doi: 10.1177/15593258221117049. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
4
Background radiation impacts human longevity and cancer mortality: reconsidering the linear no-threshold paradigm.背景辐射对人类寿命和癌症死亡率的影响:重新考虑线性无阈值范式。
Biogerontology. 2021 Apr;22(2):189-195. doi: 10.1007/s10522-020-09909-4. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.低剂量电离辐射对健康的影响:当前的科学争论与监管问题
Dose Response. 2018 Sep 19;16(3):1559325818796331. doi: 10.1177/1559325818796331. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep.
6
Cancer immunotherapy: how low-level ionizing radiation can play a key role.癌症免疫疗法:低剂量电离辐射如何发挥关键作用。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jul;66(7):819-832. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1993-z. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Lung cancer hormesis in high impact states where nuclear testing occurred.在进行过核试验的高影响地区的肺癌兴奋效应。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar;16(2):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.超低剂量电离辐射对炎症和增殖性疾病的潜在治疗作用。
Dose Response. 2012 Dec;10(4):610-25. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.12-017.Sanders. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Low-dose gamma-radiation inhibits benzo[a]pyrene-induced lung adenoma development in a/j mice.低剂量伽马辐射可抑制苯并[a]芘诱导的 a/j 小鼠肺腺瘤发生。
Dose Response. 2012 Dec;10(4):516-26. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.12-040.Bruce. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
10
Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part III - Evidence of Influence of Combined Bystander and Adaptive Response Effects on Radon Case-Control Studies - A Microdose Analysis.氡致人类肺癌风险——第三部分——氡病例对照研究中旁观者和适应性反应综合效应影响的证据——微剂量分析。
Dose Response. 2012;10(3):415-61. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-059.Leonard. Epub 2010 Sep 10.